Free Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles

"Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles" Harvard business case study is written by Patricia Tan, Ming Jian. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 25 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jul 7, 2014

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Biosensors International Group (BIG) implement a comprehensive approach to intangible asset valuation and impairment testing. This approach should incorporate a robust framework for identifying, measuring, and reporting intangible assets, aligning with relevant accounting standards and best practices. This will ensure accurate financial reporting, enhance transparency for investors, and provide a solid foundation for future strategic decision-making.

2. Background

Biosensors International Group (BIG) is a leading developer and manufacturer of biosensors for medical diagnostics and environmental monitoring. The company faces a critical challenge in accurately valuing and testing for impairment of its significant intangible assets, including intellectual property, brand recognition, and customer relationships. These assets are crucial to BIG's competitive advantage and future growth, but their valuation is complex and subject to various interpretations. The case study highlights the company's struggle to reconcile its valuation methods with evolving accounting standards and the need for a more comprehensive approach to managing its intangible assets.

The main protagonists in this case are:

  • BIG's Management: Concerned about the accuracy of their intangible asset valuation and the potential impact on financial reporting.
  • BIG's Auditors: Seeking greater transparency and consistency in the company's accounting procedures and policies related to intangible assets.
  • BIG's Investors: Looking for reliable information on the company's financial performance and the value of its intangible assets.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study presents a classic challenge faced by many companies operating in technology-intensive industries. The analysis can be structured using the following frameworks:

  • Financial Analysis: Focuses on the impact of intangible asset valuation on BIG's financial statements, specifically the balance sheet and income statement. This includes examining the impact on profitability, return on equity, and other key performance indicators.
  • Accounting Standards: Examines the relevant accounting standards, such as IFRS 3 (Business Combinations) and IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets), and how they apply to the valuation and impairment testing of intangible assets.
  • Management Accounting: Evaluates the company's current cost accounting systems and their effectiveness in tracking and allocating costs associated with intangible asset development and maintenance. This includes an assessment of activity-based costing (ABC) and its potential application to enhance cost analysis and decision-making.
  • Corporate Governance: Assesses the company's internal controls and governance structures related to intangible asset management. This includes examining the role of the board of directors, management's responsibilities, and the effectiveness of internal audit processes.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges outlined in the case study, BIG should implement the following recommendations:

  1. Develop a Comprehensive Intangible Asset Policy: Establish a clear policy outlining the company's approach to identifying, measuring, and reporting intangible assets. This policy should be aligned with relevant accounting standards, industry best practices, and the company's specific business model.
  2. Implement a Robust Valuation Framework: Develop a structured framework for valuing intangible assets, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative factors. This framework should consider factors such as market data, competitor analysis, industry benchmarks, and the company's own internal data.
  3. Enhance Impairment Testing Procedures: Establish a regular and systematic process for testing intangible assets for impairment. This process should include a clear definition of impairment triggers, a methodology for determining fair value, and a process for documenting and reporting impairment charges.
  4. Improve Internal Controls and Governance: Strengthen internal controls and governance structures related to intangible asset management. This includes clearly defining roles and responsibilities, implementing robust internal audit processes, and ensuring board oversight of intangible asset valuation and impairment testing.
  5. Invest in Technology and Expertise: Invest in technology and expertise to support the implementation of these recommendations. This includes adopting specialized software for intangible asset management, hiring qualified personnel with expertise in valuation and impairment testing, and engaging with external consultants as needed.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: BIG's core competencies lie in its intangible assets, such as its intellectual property and brand recognition. These assets are essential to its mission of developing innovative biosensors and delivering value to its customers.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: Accurate valuation and impairment testing of intangible assets are crucial for maintaining investor confidence and attracting capital. This is also essential for internal decision-making, such as resource allocation and strategic planning.
  3. Competitors: In a competitive industry like biosensors, accurate valuation of intangible assets is essential for benchmarking against competitors and understanding the company's relative competitive position.
  4. Attractiveness - Quantitative Measures: Implementing these recommendations will improve the accuracy and reliability of BIG's financial reporting, enhancing its attractiveness to investors and lenders. This will also improve the company's ability to make informed strategic decisions based on accurate financial data.
  5. Assumptions: These recommendations assume that BIG is committed to improving its financial reporting and management of intangible assets. They also assume that the company has the resources and expertise to implement these recommendations effectively.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, BIG can enhance its financial reporting, improve its ability to manage its intangible assets, and gain a competitive advantage in the biosensor industry. This will also strengthen its position with investors, lenders, and other stakeholders, leading to greater financial stability and long-term growth.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Continuing with the current approach: This would maintain the status quo but expose the company to potential risks, such as inaccurate financial reporting, regulatory scrutiny, and investor concerns.
  • Outsourcing intangible asset valuation and impairment testing: While this could provide expertise, it might not be cost-effective or provide the necessary internal control and governance.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Implementation Challenges: Implementing these recommendations requires significant effort and resources.
  • Cost of Implementation: The cost of implementing a comprehensive approach to intangible asset management may be significant.
  • Expertise and Resources: BIG needs to ensure it has the necessary expertise and resources to implement these recommendations effectively.

8. Next Steps

  1. Form a Task Force: Establish a cross-functional task force to oversee the implementation of these recommendations.
  2. Develop a Detailed Implementation Plan: Create a detailed implementation plan outlining specific tasks, timelines, and responsibilities.
  3. Pilot Test and Refine: Pilot test the new valuation framework and impairment testing procedures before full implementation.
  4. Communicate and Train: Communicate the new policies and procedures to all relevant stakeholders and provide training to ensure understanding and compliance.
  5. Monitor and Evaluate: Monitor the effectiveness of the new approach and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, BIG can ensure that its intangible assets are accurately valued and managed, leading to improved financial reporting, stronger investor confidence, and a more sustainable future for the company.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles

Case Description

Biosensors International Group (BIG), a biotechnology company listed in Singapore Exchange, acquired JW Medical Systems Ltd in 2011. This resulted in a significant increase in reported goodwill and other intangible assets. On 2 July 2012, Matthew Tay, an analyst with MMB Ltd (an equity research company in Singapore), sat staring at the balance sheets of BIG. The sum total of intangible assets and goodwill constituted 62% of total assets compared to 4% the year before. He knew that the huge increase was due to the acquisition of JW Medical Systems in 2011. He wondered what these intangible assets and goodwill represented, how they were accounted for and how they should be interpreted. This case study deals with the valuation and the impairment testing of intangibles (including goodwill) reported in the financial statements of BIG, and describes the acquisition transaction and BIG's post-acquisition financial position.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles

Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - Biosensors International Group: Valuation and Impairment Testing of Intangibles




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.