Free USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track

"USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track" Harvard business case study is written by J. Yo-Jud Cheng, Stephen E. Maiden. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 17 page(s) long and it was first published on : Aug 5, 2021

We recommend USA Track & Field (USATF) embark on a comprehensive strategic transformation focused on improving governance, enhancing athlete experience, and driving sustainable growth. This involves a multi-pronged approach encompassing organizational restructuring, financial transparency, athlete empowerment, and a robust digital strategy.

2. Background

The case study focuses on USATF, the governing body for track and field in the United States, facing significant challenges in its governance, financial stability, and athlete relations. The organization struggles with a lack of transparency, internal conflicts, and a perceived disconnect with its athletes. This has led to declining athlete participation, sponsorship revenue, and overall public interest in the sport.

The main protagonists are Max Siegel, the CEO of USATF, and the athletes, who are the core stakeholders and the driving force behind the sport's success.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

A. SWOT Analysis:

Strengths:

  • Strong tradition and history in track & field.
  • Large talent pool of athletes.
  • Potential for growth in emerging markets.
  • Significant media attention during major events.

Weaknesses:

  • Poor governance and financial transparency.
  • Lack of athlete engagement and empowerment.
  • Outdated infrastructure and technology.
  • Limited marketing and brand awareness.

Opportunities:

  • Leverage technology to improve athlete experience and data analysis.
  • Develop innovative business models to increase revenue streams.
  • Foster stronger relationships with sponsors and partners.
  • Expand into new markets and demographics.

Threats:

  • Competition from other sports and entertainment options.
  • Economic downturns impacting sponsorship and funding.
  • Negative media coverage and public perception.
  • Lack of diversity and inclusion within the organization.

B. Porter's Five Forces Analysis:

  • Threat of new entrants: Moderate, as establishing a national governing body requires significant resources and infrastructure.
  • Bargaining power of buyers (athletes): High, as athletes have limited options for competing at the highest level.
  • Bargaining power of suppliers (sponsors): Moderate, as USATF relies on sponsors for revenue, but sponsors have alternative marketing options.
  • Threat of substitutes: High, as athletes and fans have numerous entertainment options.
  • Rivalry among existing competitors: Moderate, as USATF faces competition from other sports organizations and international governing bodies.

C. Value Chain Analysis:

USATF's value chain can be analyzed as follows:

  • Inbound Logistics: Athlete recruitment, training programs, and equipment sourcing.
  • Operations: Organizing competitions, managing athlete performance, and providing support services.
  • Outbound Logistics: Broadcasting events, promoting athletes, and distributing merchandise.
  • Marketing and Sales: Attracting sponsors, engaging fans, and promoting the sport.
  • Service: Athlete support, coaching development, and event management.

D. Business Model Innovation:

USATF needs to explore new business models to increase revenue and improve athlete experience. This could include:

  • Direct-to-consumer marketing: Leverage digital platforms to sell merchandise and content directly to fans.
  • Athlete-driven content: Empower athletes to create and share their stories on social media.
  • Data-driven insights: Utilize technology to analyze athlete performance and create personalized training programs.
  • Partnerships with technology companies: Leverage AI and machine learning to enhance athlete development and fan engagement.

4. Recommendations

A. Organizational Restructuring:

  • Governance Reform: Establish an independent board of directors with diverse representation, including athlete representatives.
  • Financial Transparency: Implement robust financial reporting and auditing processes.
  • Athlete Empowerment: Create an athlete council with a voice in decision-making and governance.

B. Strategic Planning & Growth:

  • Develop a comprehensive strategic plan: Define clear goals, objectives, and key performance indicators (KPIs) for growth and sustainability.
  • Diversify revenue streams: Explore new sponsorship opportunities, merchandise sales, and digital content monetization.
  • Expand into new markets: Target emerging markets and demographics to increase athlete participation and fan engagement.

C. Digital Transformation:

  • Develop a robust digital strategy: Utilize social media, mobile apps, and online platforms to engage fans and promote athletes.
  • Invest in data analytics: Collect and analyze data to improve athlete performance, optimize marketing campaigns, and enhance fan experience.
  • Create a digital ecosystem: Integrate technology across all aspects of the organization, from athlete training to event management.

D. Marketing and Brand Management:

  • Rebrand USATF: Develop a modern and engaging brand identity that resonates with athletes and fans.
  • Focus on storytelling: Share compelling athlete stories and highlight the values and excitement of track and field.
  • Leverage social media and influencer marketing: Engage with athletes and fans on social media platforms.

E. Athlete Development and Support:

  • Improve athlete support services: Provide comprehensive resources for athletes, including training facilities, coaching, and mental health support.
  • Invest in talent identification and development: Identify and nurture young talent to ensure a pipeline of future athletes.
  • Create a culture of excellence: Foster a positive and supportive environment that encourages athletes to achieve their full potential.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of USATF's current situation, considering its core competencies, external customers (athletes and fans), competitors, and financial viability.

  • Core Competencies: The recommendations leverage USATF's strong tradition and talent pool, while addressing its weaknesses in governance and athlete engagement.
  • External Customers: The recommendations focus on enhancing the athlete experience and creating a more engaging and accessible sport for fans.
  • Competitors: The recommendations aim to differentiate USATF from competitors by focusing on innovation, athlete empowerment, and a strong digital presence.
  • Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve financial performance through increased revenue streams, sponsorship opportunities, and fan engagement.

6. Conclusion

By implementing these recommendations, USATF can transform itself into a more transparent, athlete-centric, and financially sustainable organization. This will allow the organization to regain its position as a leading force in track and field, attracting top athletes, sponsors, and fans.

7. Discussion

Alternatives not selected:

  • Mergers and Acquisitions: While M&A could provide access to resources and expertise, it carries significant risks and may not be the best fit for USATF's current situation.
  • Outsourcing: Outsourcing certain functions could save costs, but it may lead to a loss of control and a weakened brand identity.

Risks and Assumptions:

  • Implementation Challenges: Implementing these recommendations requires significant resources, commitment, and change management expertise.
  • Financial Sustainability: Achieving financial sustainability relies on successful execution of the strategic plan and a positive response from sponsors and fans.
  • Athlete Buy-in: Athlete support and participation are crucial for the success of these recommendations.

8. Next Steps

  • Form a task force: Assemble a team of stakeholders to oversee the implementation of the strategic transformation.
  • Develop a detailed implementation plan: Outline specific actions, timelines, and resources needed for each recommendation.
  • Communicate effectively: Ensure transparency and open communication with athletes, sponsors, and the public throughout the process.
  • Monitor progress and adjust accordingly: Regularly evaluate progress against KPIs and make necessary adjustments to the plan.

By taking these steps, USATF can embark on a journey of transformation, putting its governance on track and achieving sustainable growth for the future of track and field in the United States.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

This public-sourced case set in May 2020 examines various corporate governance issues that have arisen for the nonprofit USA Track & Field (USATF). The case's protagonist is board member Tricia Myers who considers how the board can better serve its constituents as they are inundated with a torrent of issues around CEO compensation, fundraising, and governance regulations. The board faces a fire drill as CEO Max Siegel's high compensation has just been made public, surprising the board and requiring a response. Students can use the data provided in the case to evaluate whether Siegel's compensation package is "fair and reasonable" for a nonprofit executive and recommend next steps. The board also grapples with whether Nike's influence over USATF has grown too large after Siegel signed a long-term sponsorship contract with the company that provided the bulk of USATF's total revenues but also created potential conflicts of interest and polarized USATF's elite athletes. Lastly, the board contemplates regulatory changes imposed by the US Olympic and Paralympic Committee and the implications for its membership base. This case allows for a rich discussion about a nonprofit's mission statement and business model, aligning stakeholder interests, and the role of nonprofit board members.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track

USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - USA Track & Field: Getting Its Governance on Track




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.