Free The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008

"The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008" Harvard business case study is written by Brett Saraniti. It deals with the challenges in the field of Strategy. The case study is 6 page(s) long and it was first published on : Jan 1, 2008

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that Hawaiian Airlines adopt a multi-pronged strategy to navigate the turbulent Hawaiian airline industry. This strategy should focus on innovation, strategic alliances, and product differentiation to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. It should also prioritize environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility to resonate with the environmentally conscious Hawaiian market and attract a broader customer base.

2. Background

The case study focuses on the Hawaiian airline industry between 2001 and 2008, a period marked by significant challenges including the 9/11 attacks, the rise of low-cost carriers, and increased competition. Hawaiian Airlines, the dominant carrier in the state, faced pressure from both established airlines and new entrants, forcing them to adapt their business model and competitive strategy.

The main protagonists are:

  • Hawaiian Airlines: The incumbent carrier with a strong brand and existing infrastructure.
  • Low-cost carriers: New entrants like Aloha Airlines and ATA Airlines, challenging Hawaiian Airlines on price and service.
  • Established airlines: Carriers like Continental and United Airlines, competing for inter-island and international routes.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

To analyze the situation, we employ a combination of frameworks:

Porter's Five Forces:

  • Threat of new entrants: High, due to the low barriers to entry in the industry.
  • Bargaining power of buyers: Moderate, with price-sensitive customers but limited alternatives.
  • Bargaining power of suppliers: Low, with readily available aircraft and fuel.
  • Threat of substitute products: Moderate, with potential for alternative modes of transportation like ferries.
  • Competitive rivalry: High, with intense competition from both low-cost carriers and established airlines.

SWOT Analysis:

Strengths:

  • Strong brand recognition and customer loyalty.
  • Established route network and infrastructure.
  • Experienced workforce.

Weaknesses:

  • Limited financial resources compared to larger competitors.
  • High operating costs due to isolated location.
  • Lack of a robust loyalty program.

Opportunities:

  • Growing tourism industry in Hawaii.
  • Potential for international expansion.
  • Increasing demand for sustainable travel options.

Threats:

  • Competition from low-cost carriers.
  • Economic downturns impacting travel demand.
  • Environmental regulations impacting operations.

Value Chain Analysis:

Hawaiian Airlines' value chain needs to be optimized for cost efficiency and customer experience. This includes:

  • Inbound logistics: Streamlining procurement and supply chain management.
  • Operations: Utilizing technology and analytics for optimal flight scheduling and fuel efficiency.
  • Outbound logistics: Efficient baggage handling and customer service.
  • Marketing and sales: Leveraging digital marketing and social media to reach target audiences.
  • Service: Providing a unique and memorable customer experience.

4. Recommendations

  1. Embrace Innovation: Hawaiian Airlines should invest in disruptive innovation to differentiate itself from competitors. This could involve:

    • Technology and Analytics: Implementing advanced IT systems for dynamic pricing, personalized marketing, and improved operational efficiency.
    • Product Development: Introducing new routes, innovative cabin configurations, and enhanced in-flight entertainment.
    • Business Model Innovation: Exploring new revenue streams like ancillary services and partnerships with local businesses.
  2. Strategic Alliances: Hawaiian Airlines should form strategic alliances with other airlines and travel companies to expand its reach and offer more comprehensive travel packages. This could involve:

    • Code-sharing agreements: Offering seamless connections to international destinations.
    • Joint ventures: Collaborating with airlines in Asia and the Pacific to tap into emerging markets.
    • Partnerships: Collaborating with hotels, tour operators, and other travel-related businesses.
  3. Product Differentiation: Hawaiian Airlines should focus on product differentiation to attract and retain customers. This could involve:

    • Brand Management: Strengthening its brand image by emphasizing Hawaiian culture, hospitality, and environmental sustainability.
    • Marketing Strategy: Utilizing digital marketing and social media to target specific customer segments.
    • Customer Experience: Providing exceptional customer service and creating a unique and memorable travel experience.
  4. Environmental Sustainability: Hawaiian Airlines should prioritize environmental sustainability to appeal to the environmentally conscious traveler and meet growing regulatory requirements. This could involve:

    • Fuel Efficiency: Investing in fuel-efficient aircraft and implementing operational improvements to reduce fuel consumption.
    • Carbon Offsetting: Partnering with organizations to offset carbon emissions from flights.
    • Waste Reduction: Implementing recycling and waste reduction programs throughout the airline.
  5. Corporate Social Responsibility: Hawaiian Airlines should embrace corporate social responsibility to build trust with customers and stakeholders. This could involve:

    • Community Engagement: Supporting local charities and initiatives in Hawaii.
    • Employee Welfare: Promoting a positive and inclusive work environment.
    • Ethical Sourcing: Ensuring ethical sourcing practices for all products and services.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a careful analysis of the Hawaiian airline industry and Hawaiian Airlines' unique strengths and weaknesses. They consider:

  1. Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations leverage Hawaiian Airlines' existing brand strength and focus on its commitment to Hawaiian culture and hospitality.
  2. External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the needs of both price-sensitive and luxury travelers, while also promoting employee satisfaction and engagement.
  3. Competitors: The recommendations differentiate Hawaiian Airlines from competitors by focusing on innovation, sustainability, and customer experience.
  4. Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve Hawaiian Airlines' profitability and market share by capturing new customer segments and increasing operational efficiency.

6. Conclusion

By embracing innovation, forming strategic alliances, differentiating its product offerings, and prioritizing environmental sustainability and corporate social responsibility, Hawaiian Airlines can navigate the competitive Hawaiian airline industry and achieve sustainable growth. This strategy will position Hawaiian Airlines as a leader in the industry and ensure its long-term success.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Cost leadership: Focusing solely on price competition, which could lead to a price war and erode profitability.
  • Mergers and acquisitions: Acquiring competitors, which could be costly and face regulatory hurdles.
  • Vertical integration: Expanding into related businesses like hotels or tourism services, which could require significant investment and expertise.

The key risks and assumptions associated with the recommended strategy include:

  • Economic downturn: A downturn in the economy could negatively impact travel demand.
  • Competition: Competitors could adopt similar strategies, leading to increased rivalry.
  • Technology disruption: New technologies could emerge that disrupt the airline industry.

8. Next Steps

To implement the recommended strategy, Hawaiian Airlines should:

  • Phase 1 (Year 1): Develop a detailed strategic plan, invest in new technology, and launch a pilot program for sustainable practices.
  • Phase 2 (Year 2): Implement strategic alliances, launch new product offerings, and expand marketing efforts.
  • Phase 3 (Year 3): Continuously monitor performance, adapt the strategy based on market conditions, and expand international operations.

By taking these steps, Hawaiian Airlines can position itself for long-term success in the dynamic and competitive Hawaiian airline industry.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Two Hawaiian airlines' cooperative environment is disrupted by the entry of a third competitor, Mesa Airways. The price war leads to fares as low as $0 and causes more than $100 million in losses in the first year with no end in sight. Industry risk factors for price competition were reduced in 2001 when the government granted a one-year reprieve from anti-trust laws, but increased dramatically after Mesa's announced entry.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008

The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008 case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Strategy case study - The Hawaiian Airline Industry, 2001-2008




Referrences & Bibliography for Harvard Stategy Case Study Analysis & Solution

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.