Free Should the General Manager Be Fired? Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Should the General Manager Be Fired?

"Should the General Manager Be Fired?" Harvard business case study is written by MU Fengli, Tieying Huang, Jiao Li. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 10 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 20, 2015

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged approach to address the challenges at the manufacturing plant. This includes retaining the General Manager, John, but implementing a comprehensive plan to improve leadership, communication, and team dynamics. We believe this strategy offers the best chance for long-term success, fostering a positive organizational culture and achieving sustainable improvements in productivity and employee engagement.

2. Background

This case study focuses on the struggles of a manufacturing plant at Fern Fort University, facing declining productivity, low employee morale, and a strained relationship between the General Manager, John, and his team. John, a highly competent engineer, is perceived as lacking in leadership and communication skills, leading to a breakdown in trust and a lack of motivation among employees. The plant's success is crucial to the university's overall operations, making the current situation a critical concern.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Organizational Behavior and Leadership: The case highlights the critical role of leadership in shaping organizational culture and performance. John's authoritarian management style and lack of emotional intelligence have created a negative work environment, characterized by fear, distrust, and low morale. This has led to a decline in employee engagement, productivity, and ultimately, the plant's overall effectiveness.

Team Dynamics and Communication: The breakdown in communication between John and his team is a major contributing factor to the current crisis. John's lack of transparency and his reluctance to involve employees in decision-making processes have created a sense of alienation and resentment. This has hindered collaboration, innovation, and overall team performance.

Change Management: The plant's resistance to change is another crucial factor. John's reluctance to embrace new ideas and his resistance to feedback have created a culture of stagnation, hindering the plant's ability to adapt to changing market demands and technological advancements.

Using the Framework of Organizational Culture:

  • Culture: The plant's culture is characterized by a lack of trust, fear of failure, and a lack of autonomy. This is a direct result of John's leadership style and his resistance to change.
  • Values: The plant's values are not clearly defined, and there is a lack of alignment between John's values and those of his team. This has led to a disconnect between the plant's goals and the employees' aspirations.
  • Assumptions: The plant's assumptions are based on a traditional, hierarchical model of management, which is no longer effective in today's dynamic business environment.

Using the Framework of Motivation Theories:

  • Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: John's leadership style fails to address the higher-level needs of his team, such as esteem and self-actualization. This has resulted in a lack of motivation and a sense of dissatisfaction among employees.
  • Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory: John's management style focuses primarily on hygiene factors (e.g., salary, working conditions), neglecting motivators (e.g., recognition, achievement, growth). This has led to a lack of intrinsic motivation and a decline in employee performance.

Using the Framework of Conflict Resolution:

  • John's avoidance of conflict: John's reluctance to address issues directly has allowed conflicts to escalate, creating a toxic work environment.
  • Lack of communication: The lack of open and honest communication has prevented the team from resolving conflicts effectively.

Using the Framework of Power and Politics in Organizations:

  • John's abuse of power: John's authoritarian style has created a power imbalance, leading to a sense of powerlessness among employees.
  • Lack of transparency: John's lack of transparency in decision-making has fueled political maneuvering and created mistrust among employees.

4. Recommendations

  1. Leadership Development for John: John needs to undergo intensive leadership training to develop his emotional intelligence, communication skills, and ability to build trust and empower his team. This training should focus on:

    • Transformational Leadership: Developing a vision for the plant and inspiring his team to achieve it.
    • Active Listening: Learning to effectively listen to and understand his team's concerns and ideas.
    • Delegation and Empowerment: Giving employees more autonomy and responsibility, fostering a sense of ownership.
    • Feedback and Recognition: Providing constructive feedback and recognizing employee contributions.
  2. Team Building and Communication: Implement team-building initiatives and communication workshops to improve collaboration, trust, and conflict resolution within the team. This should include:

    • Open Communication Channels: Establishing regular team meetings, open forums, and feedback mechanisms to encourage open dialogue and transparency.
    • Conflict Resolution Training: Providing employees with the skills and tools to effectively manage conflicts and resolve disagreements.
    • Cross-Functional Teams: Creating cross-functional teams to foster collaboration and knowledge sharing across departments.
  3. Change Management Strategy: Develop a comprehensive change management strategy to address the plant's resistance to change. This should involve:

    • Communicating the Vision: Clearly communicating the need for change and the benefits it will bring to the plant and its employees.
    • Involving Employees: Engaging employees in the change process, seeking their input and feedback.
    • Providing Training and Support: Providing employees with the necessary training and support to adapt to the changes.
  4. Performance Management System: Implement a robust performance management system that focuses on both individual and team performance. This should include:

    • Clear Performance Goals: Setting clear and measurable performance goals for both individuals and teams.
    • Regular Performance Reviews: Conducting regular performance reviews to provide feedback and recognition.
    • Performance-Based Rewards: Implementing a system of rewards and incentives based on performance.
  5. Employee Engagement Initiatives: Implement initiatives to improve employee engagement, such as:

    • Employee Recognition Programs: Recognizing and rewarding employees for their contributions.
    • Employee Development Programs: Providing opportunities for employees to develop their skills and advance their careers.
    • Work-Life Balance Programs: Offering programs to support employees' work-life balance.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of the case study, considering the following factors:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with the university's mission of providing quality education and research, ensuring the plant's success is crucial to achieving this mission.
  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations focus on improving customer satisfaction and internal client relationships, ensuring the plant meets the needs of both.
  3. Competitors: The recommendations aim to enhance the plant's competitiveness by improving efficiency, productivity, and employee engagement.
  4. Attractiveness: The recommendations are expected to improve the plant's profitability and long-term sustainability, making it an attractive investment for the university.

Assumptions:

  • John is willing to commit to leadership development and change.
  • Employees are open to change and willing to embrace new leadership.
  • The university is committed to supporting the plant's transformation.

6. Conclusion

Firing John would be a short-sighted and potentially damaging decision. While he has weaknesses, his technical expertise and commitment to the plant are valuable assets. By investing in his leadership development and implementing a comprehensive plan to improve communication, team dynamics, and employee engagement, the plant can achieve a sustainable turnaround. This approach will foster a positive organizational culture, improve productivity, and ultimately, ensure the plant's long-term success.

7. Discussion

Alternative Options:

  • Firing John: This would be a drastic measure that could create further instability and damage the plant's reputation. It would also be a costly and time-consuming process to find and hire a new manager.
  • Demoting John: This could be seen as a demotion and could damage his morale. It might also not address the underlying issues of leadership and communication.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • John's resistance to change: If John is unwilling to change his leadership style, the recommendations will be ineffective.
  • Employee resistance to change: If employees are resistant to change, the implementation process will be challenging.
  • University's commitment to support: If the university is not committed to providing the necessary resources and support, the recommendations will be difficult to implement.

8. Next Steps

  1. Immediate Action: The university should immediately initiate leadership development training for John.
  2. Short-Term Goals: Implement team-building initiatives and communication workshops within the next three months.
  3. Mid-Term Goals: Develop and implement a change management strategy and performance management system within the next six months.
  4. Long-Term Goals: Continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented changes, making adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, Fern Fort University can create a positive and productive work environment at the manufacturing plant, ensuring its long-term success and contributing to the university's overall mission.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Should the General Manager Be Fired?

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In September 2008, the CEO of Rainbow Group, a Chinese group of companies specializing in environmental protection services, was in Beijing, China, thinking about his experience that evening. A few hours ago, eight senior executives from Rainbow Group's subsidiary in Hangzhou had come to Beijing requesting that the CEO fire their general manager, who had been appointed by the CEO only six months ago. This manager had taken control of the Hangzhou subsidiary with ambitious efforts to implement lean management and better cost control, but had met resistance from the other managers. The CEO was reviewing this appointment and thinking hard. What was the problem? What should he do?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Should the General Manager Be Fired?

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Should the General Manager Be Fired?

Should the General Manager Be Fired? FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Should the General Manager Be Fired?" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Should the General Manager Be Fired? ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Should the General Manager Be Fired? case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Should the General Manager Be Fired?. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Should the General Manager Be Fired?" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Should the General Manager Be Fired? & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Should the General Manager Be Fired?" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Should the General Manager Be Fired? solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Should the General Manager Be Fired?

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Should the General Manager Be Fired?" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Should the General Manager Be Fired?"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Should the General Manager Be Fired? to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Should the General Manager Be Fired? ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Should the General Manager Be Fired? case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Should the General Manager Be Fired?" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Should the General Manager Be Fired?




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.