Free Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey

"Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey" Harvard business case study is written by Gerard Seijts, Thomas Watson. It deals with the challenges in the field of Organizational Behavior. The case study is 14 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 24, 2022

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multifaceted approach to address the contrasting perspectives of Tom Peters and McKinsey on the nature of capitalism. We propose a framework that embraces both the entrepreneurial spirit and the strategic rigor needed to navigate the complexities of modern business. This framework will foster a culture of innovation, collaboration, and ethical leadership, ensuring long-term success for organizations.

2. Background

This case study explores the contrasting views of Tom Peters and McKinsey regarding the nature of capitalism. Peters emphasizes the importance of entrepreneurial spirit, agility, and customer focus, while McKinsey promotes a more structured and analytical approach, emphasizing efficiency, cost optimization, and strategic planning. The case highlights the tension between these two perspectives and their implications for organizational behavior and leadership.

The main protagonists are Tom Peters, a renowned management guru known for his unconventional and inspiring approach to business, and McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm known for its rigorous analytical frameworks and strategic advice. Their contrasting views represent a broader debate about the best way to manage organizations in a rapidly changing world.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of organizational behavior and leadership, focusing on the following key aspects:

Leadership Styles:

  • Tom Peters: Represents a transformational leadership style, emphasizing vision, inspiration, and empowering employees to take ownership. He encourages entrepreneurship, innovation, and customer-centricity.
  • McKinsey: Embraces a more transactional leadership style, focusing on structure, processes, and achieving measurable results. They emphasize strategic planning, efficiency, and cost optimization.

Organizational Culture:

  • Tom Peters: Advocates for a flat organizational structure with high levels of employee autonomy and empowerment. He emphasizes open communication, creativity, and risk-taking.
  • McKinsey: Favors a hierarchical structure with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. They prioritize data-driven decision-making, process optimization, and consistency.

Team Dynamics:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages cross-functional teams with diverse perspectives and strong communication. He values collaboration, shared leadership, and individual initiative.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes specialized teams with clearly defined roles and accountability. They prioritize teamwork, efficiency, and achievement of shared goals.

Motivation Theories:

  • Tom Peters: Aligns with intrinsic motivation theories, emphasizing meaningful work, autonomy, and growth opportunities.
  • McKinsey: Leans towards extrinsic motivation theories, focusing on performance-based rewards, recognition, and career advancement.

Change Management:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages agile change management, emphasizing adaptability, experimentation, and continuous improvement.
  • McKinsey: Favors a structured change management approach, emphasizing planning, communication, and implementation.

Conflict Resolution:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication and constructive dialogue to resolve conflicts. He values collaboration and finding win-win solutions.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes data-driven analysis and objective decision-making to resolve conflicts. They prioritize efficiency and achieving optimal outcomes.

Power and Politics in Organizations:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages shared power and decentralized decision-making. He believes in empowering employees and fostering a collaborative environment.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of hierarchy and formal authority. They emphasize strategic planning, resource allocation, and achieving organizational goals.

Decision-Making Processes:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages intuitive decision-making, experimentation, and rapid prototyping. He values creativity, innovation, and customer feedback.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes data-driven decision-making, analytical frameworks, and rigorous analysis. They prioritize objectivity, efficiency, and risk mitigation.

Emotional Intelligence:

  • Tom Peters: Emphasizes the importance of emotional intelligence in leadership, encouraging empathy, communication, and building relationships.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of emotional intelligence in managing teams and clients, but prioritizes analytical skills and strategic thinking.

Employee Engagement:

  • Tom Peters: Focuses on intrinsic motivation and employee empowerment to foster high levels of engagement. He emphasizes meaningful work, autonomy, and growth opportunities.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes performance-based recognition, career development opportunities, and clear communication to drive employee engagement.

Organizational Structure:

  • Tom Peters: Advocates for flat organizational structures with decentralized decision-making and high levels of employee autonomy.
  • McKinsey: Favors hierarchical structures with clearly defined roles and responsibilities and centralized decision-making.

Group Behavior:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages cross-functional teams with diverse perspectives and strong communication. He values collaboration, shared leadership, and individual initiative.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes specialized teams with clearly defined roles and accountability. They prioritize teamwork, efficiency, and achievement of shared goals.

Communication Patterns:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication, transparency, and feedback mechanisms. He values active listening, empathy, and building relationships.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes clear communication, formal channels, and data-driven presentations. They prioritize conciseness, accuracy, and achieving desired outcomes.

Performance Management:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages continuous feedback, employee development, and recognition of achievements. He values individual growth, learning, and contributing to a shared vision.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes performance metrics, objective assessments, and goal setting. They prioritize achievement, accountability, and measurable results.

Organizational Learning:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages experimentation, learning from failures, and adapting to changing circumstances. He values flexibility, agility, and continuous improvement.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes data analysis, best practices, and formal knowledge sharing. They prioritize efficiency, consistency, and achieving desired outcomes.

Diversity and Inclusion:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages diversity of thought, inclusion, and respect for different perspectives. He values collaboration, creativity, and innovation.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes diversity of skills and experiences to achieve optimal performance. They prioritize fairness, equity, and achieving organizational goals.

Job Satisfaction:

  • Tom Peters: Focuses on meaningful work, autonomy, and growth opportunities to foster high levels of job satisfaction.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes career development opportunities, recognition, and compensation to drive job satisfaction.

Work-Life Balance:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages flexible work arrangements, employee well-being, and a healthy work-life balance.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of work-life balance but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and meeting deadlines.

Organizational Commitment:

  • Tom Peters: Fosters organizational commitment through shared values, employee empowerment, and a sense of purpose.
  • McKinsey: Encourages organizational commitment through clear goals, performance-based rewards, and career advancement opportunities.

Personality Traits in the Workplace:

  • Tom Peters: Values entrepreneurial spirit, creativity, risk-taking, and adaptability.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes analytical skills, problem-solving abilities, strategic thinking, and efficiency.

Organizational Justice:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages fairness, transparency, and accountability to foster organizational justice.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes merit-based performance, clear policies, and due process to ensure organizational justice.

Stress Management:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages work-life balance, employee well-being, and stress management techniques.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of stress management but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and meeting deadlines.

Psychological Contracts:

  • Tom Peters: Emphasizes mutual trust, open communication, and shared values to build strong psychological contracts.
  • McKinsey: Focuses on clear expectations, performance-based rewards, and career development opportunities to establish psychological contracts.

Organizational Citizenship Behavior:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages proactive behavior, going above and beyond, and contributing to the organization's success.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes following procedures, achieving goals, and maintaining high standards to foster organizational citizenship behavior.

Virtual Teams:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages virtual teams with strong communication, collaboration, and shared goals.
  • McKinsey: Leverages technology and structured processes to manage virtual teams effectively.

Cross-Cultural Management:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages cultural sensitivity, adaptability, and respect for different perspectives in cross-cultural management.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes cultural awareness, communication skills, and understanding of different business practices in cross-cultural management.

Organizational Development:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages continuous improvement, experimentation, and adapting to changing circumstances.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes strategic planning, data-driven analysis, and structured implementation in organizational development.

Job Design and Characteristics:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages meaningful work, autonomy, and growth opportunities in job design.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes efficiency, clear roles and responsibilities, and achieving organizational goals in job design.

Perception and Attribution:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication, feedback mechanisms, and understanding different perspectives to manage perception and attribution.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes data analysis, objective assessments, and clear communication to manage perception and attribution.

Negotiation and Conflict Management:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages collaborative negotiation, win-win solutions, and open communication to manage conflict.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes strategic negotiation, data-driven analysis, and achieving optimal outcomes in conflict management.

Ethical Behavior in Organizations:

  • Tom Peters: Emphasizes integrity, transparency, and social responsibility in ethical behavior.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes compliance, due diligence, and following ethical guidelines in ethical behavior.

Transformational Leadership:

  • Tom Peters: Represents a transformational leadership style, emphasizing vision, inspiration, and empowering employees to take ownership.
  • McKinsey: May embrace elements of transformational leadership but prioritize strategic planning, efficiency, and achieving measurable results.

Employee Motivation Strategies:

  • Tom Peters: Focuses on intrinsic motivation, meaningful work, autonomy, and growth opportunities.
  • McKinsey: Leans towards extrinsic motivation, emphasizing performance-based rewards, recognition, and career advancement.

Organizational Socialization:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication, mentorship, and shared values to foster organizational socialization.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes onboarding programs, training, and clear expectations to facilitate organizational socialization.

Workplace Creativity and Innovation:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages experimentation, risk-taking, and cross-functional collaboration to foster workplace creativity and innovation.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes structured innovation processes, data analysis, and strategic planning to drive workplace creativity and innovation.

Organizational Trust:

  • Tom Peters: Fosters organizational trust through transparency, open communication, and shared values.
  • McKinsey: Builds organizational trust through consistency, fairness, and achieving desired outcomes.

Psychological Safety:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication, feedback mechanisms, and a culture of respect to foster psychological safety.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of psychological safety but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and meeting deadlines.

Feedback Mechanisms:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages continuous feedback, employee development, and recognition of achievements.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes performance metrics, objective assessments, and goal setting in feedback mechanisms.

Resistance to Change:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication, employee involvement, and a shared vision to manage resistance to change.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes clear communication, structured implementation, and addressing concerns to manage resistance to change.

Organizational Identity:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages strong organizational identity through shared values, employee empowerment, and a sense of purpose.
  • McKinsey: Builds organizational identity through brand reputation, performance excellence, and achieving strategic goals.

Workplace Diversity Management:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages diversity of thought, inclusion, and respect for different perspectives.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes diversity of skills and experiences to achieve optimal performance.

Organizational Politics:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages shared power, decentralized decision-making, and collaboration to minimize organizational politics.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the presence of organizational politics but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and maintaining a structured environment.

Employee Empowerment:

  • Tom Peters: Emphasizes employee empowerment, autonomy, and taking ownership.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of employee empowerment but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and meeting deadlines.

Organizational Climate:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages open communication, collaboration, and a culture of innovation to foster a positive organizational climate.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes clear expectations, performance-based recognition, and achieving desired outcomes to create a productive organizational climate.

Workplace Attitudes and Behaviors:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages positive attitudes, proactive behavior, and contributing to the organization's success.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes professionalism, accountability, and achieving organizational goals in workplace attitudes and behaviors.

Team Building Techniques:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages cross-functional teams, shared leadership, and building relationships in team building.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes structured team building activities, clear roles and responsibilities, and achieving shared goals.

Organizational Symbolism:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages meaningful symbolism, employee stories, and a sense of purpose to build organizational symbolism.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes brand reputation, performance excellence, and achieving strategic goals to create organizational symbolism.

Workplace Wellbeing:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages work-life balance, employee well-being, and stress management techniques.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of workplace wellbeing but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and meeting deadlines.

Organizational Storytelling:

  • Tom Peters: Encourages employee stories, shared values, and a sense of purpose in organizational storytelling.
  • McKinsey: Emphasizes case studies, best practices, and achieving desired outcomes in organizational storytelling.

Psychological Capital:

  • Tom Peters: Fosters psychological capital through employee empowerment, meaningful work, and a sense of purpose.
  • McKinsey: Recognizes the importance of psychological capital but prioritizes achieving organizational goals and meeting deadlines.

4. Recommendations

To bridge the gap between Tom Peters' and McKinsey's perspectives, we recommend the following:

  1. Embrace a Hybrid Leadership Model: Organizations should adopt a hybrid leadership model that combines the strengths of both transformational and transactional leadership. This approach involves setting clear goals and strategies while simultaneously inspiring and empowering employees to drive innovation and achieve organizational success.

  2. Cultivate a Culture of Innovation and Collaboration: Organizations should foster a culture that values both entrepreneurial spirit and strategic rigor. This involves encouraging risk-taking, experimentation, and cross-functional collaboration while maintaining a focus on data-driven decision-making and strategic planning.

  3. Empower Employees and Foster a Sense of Ownership: Organizations should empower employees by providing them with autonomy, meaningful work, and opportunities for growth. This fosters a sense of ownership and commitment, leading to higher levels of engagement, creativity, and innovation.

  4. Develop a Balanced Performance Management System: Organizations should adopt a performance management system that balances both quantitative and qualitative measures. This involves setting clear goals and objectives while also recognizing and rewarding employee contributions, creativity, and initiative.

  5. Promote Open Communication and Feedback Mechanisms: Organizations should encourage open communication, feedback mechanisms, and a culture of transparency. This fosters trust, collaboration, and a shared understanding of organizational goals and values.

  6. Invest in Leadership Development and Training: Organizations should invest in leadership development programs that equip leaders with the skills and knowledge to navigate the complexities of modern business. This includes developing both transformational and transactional leadership skills, fostering emotional intelligence, and promoting ethical decision-making.

  7. Embrace Diversity and Inclusion: Organizations should actively promote diversity and inclusion in all aspects of the organization. This involves creating an inclusive culture that values different perspectives, experiences, and backgrounds, fostering creativity and innovation.

  8. Continuously Adapt and Learn: Organizations should embrace a culture of continuous learning and adaptation. This involves encouraging experimentation, learning from failures, and adapting to changing circumstances, ensuring long-term success in a dynamic business environment.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a comprehensive understanding of the contrasting perspectives of Tom Peters and McKinsey, and they consider the following factors:

  1. Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations align with the core competencies of both entrepreneurial spirit and strategic rigor, ensuring consistency with the organization's mission and long-term success.

  2. External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations prioritize customer satisfaction and employee engagement, ensuring that the organization meets the needs of both external and internal stakeholders.

  3. Competitors: The recommendations consider the competitive landscape and the need for organizations to adapt and innovate

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In early 2021, McKinsey & Company (McKinsey) agreed to pay US$573 million to end US state-level investigations into claims that it had helped exacerbate the global opioid crisis. Tom Peters, an influential and highly respected management guru, was upset by how far his former employer had been willing to go in helping US drug maker Purdue Pharma LP increase sales of OxyContin, a narcotic-based painkiller that helped drive an opioid epidemic responsible for hundreds of thousands of tragic deaths. As far as Peters was concerned, there was no question as to whether what McKinsey did was wrong: it had ignored the moral responsibility of business by helping an unethical client maximize profit by aggressively promoting the wide-scale use of a highly addictive drug. In addition to asking why McKinsey was still open for business, Peters posed a previously unimaginable question: At this moment in time, why would anyone want to go to work for McKinsey?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey

Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Organizational Behavior case study - Defining Capitalism's Character: Tom Peters versus McKinsey




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.