Free Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System

"Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System" Harvard business case study is written by Nitin Nohria, John Chalykoff. It deals with the challenges in the field of Human Resource Management. The case study is 17 page(s) long and it was first published on : Feb 15, 1990

At Fern Fort University, we recommend the IRS implement a phased approach to the automated collection system, prioritizing employee training, communication, and change management. This approach will ensure a smooth transition, minimize resistance, and maximize the effectiveness of the new system.

2. Background

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) faces a significant challenge in modernizing its collection system. The current system is outdated, inefficient, and susceptible to errors. This case study focuses on the IRS's decision to implement an automated collection system to improve efficiency, reduce errors, and enhance customer service. However, the implementation faces resistance from employees who fear job displacement and a lack of understanding of the new system.

The main protagonists are:

  • IRS leadership: They are tasked with implementing the new system and navigating employee concerns.
  • Employees: They are worried about the impact of automation on their jobs and the potential for errors in the new system.
  • Taxpayers: They are the end users of the collection system and stand to benefit from improved efficiency and accuracy.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study highlights several key issues:

  • Resistance to Change: Employees are understandably apprehensive about the new system, fearing job displacement and potential errors. This resistance is a significant obstacle to successful implementation.
  • Lack of Communication and Training: The IRS has not effectively communicated the benefits of the automated system to employees, nor has it provided adequate training on how to use it. This lack of communication and training fuels employee anxiety and resistance.
  • Organizational Culture: The IRS's traditional, hierarchical culture may hinder the adoption of new technology and processes. Employees may be accustomed to working in a specific way and resistant to change.
  • Talent Management: The IRS needs to address employee concerns about job security and career advancement. This requires a comprehensive talent management strategy that includes training, upskilling, and career development opportunities.

Framework: This case study can be analyzed using the Lewin's Change Management Model, which outlines three stages:

  • Unfreeze: The IRS needs to create a sense of urgency and demonstrate the need for change by highlighting the inefficiencies of the current system.
  • Change: This stage involves implementing the new automated system. This requires clear communication, training, and support for employees throughout the process.
  • Refreeze: The IRS needs to solidify the new system by integrating it into the organization's culture and processes. This requires ongoing monitoring, feedback, and adjustments.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges outlined above, the IRS should implement the following recommendations:

  • Phased Implementation: The IRS should implement the automated system in phases, starting with a pilot program in a specific area or department. This will allow the IRS to test the system, identify potential issues, and address employee concerns before rolling it out to the entire organization.
  • Employee Training and Communication: The IRS needs to invest heavily in employee training and communication. This includes providing comprehensive training on the new system, addressing employee concerns, and highlighting the benefits of the automated system.
  • Change Management Strategy: The IRS should develop a comprehensive change management strategy that includes:
    • Clear communication: Regularly communicate the benefits of the new system and address employee concerns.
    • Employee involvement: Involve employees in the design and implementation of the new system.
    • Support system: Provide employees with the necessary support and resources to transition to the new system.
  • Talent Management: The IRS should implement a robust talent management strategy that includes:
    • Upskilling and Reskilling: Provide training and development opportunities to help employees adapt to the new system and acquire new skills.
    • Career Development: Offer career development opportunities to employees who may be displaced by the new system.
    • Performance Management: Implement a performance management system that rewards employees for adapting to the new system and contributing to its success.
  • Organizational Culture: The IRS should foster a culture of innovation and continuous improvement. This includes:
    • Leadership Support: Leadership needs to champion the new system and demonstrate their commitment to its success.
    • Open Communication: Encourage open communication and feedback from employees.
    • Employee Recognition: Recognize and reward employees who contribute to the success of the new system.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The automated system aligns with the IRS's mission of ensuring fair and efficient tax administration. By improving efficiency and accuracy, the system will help the IRS fulfill its core competencies.
  • External customers and internal clients: The new system will benefit both taxpayers and IRS employees. Taxpayers will experience improved customer service and faster processing times, while employees will benefit from a more efficient and user-friendly system.
  • Competitors: The IRS needs to keep pace with other government agencies and private sector organizations that are adopting new technologies to improve efficiency and customer service.
  • Attractiveness - quantitative measures if applicable: The automated system is expected to generate significant cost savings and efficiency gains for the IRS. This will free up resources for other initiatives and improve the overall effectiveness of the agency.
  • Assumptions: The success of these recommendations depends on the assumption that the IRS is committed to implementing the new system effectively and addressing employee concerns.

6. Conclusion

The IRS's implementation of an automated collection system presents a significant opportunity to improve efficiency, reduce errors, and enhance customer service. However, the success of this initiative depends on addressing employee concerns, providing adequate training, and fostering a culture of change. By implementing the recommendations outlined above, the IRS can ensure a smooth transition to the new system and achieve its desired outcomes.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Outsourcing: The IRS could outsource the collection system to a private company. However, this option raises concerns about data security and the potential for conflicts of interest.
  • Delaying implementation: The IRS could delay the implementation of the new system. However, this would prolong the inefficiencies of the current system and delay the benefits of the automated system.

Risks:

  • Employee resistance: Despite efforts to mitigate resistance, some employees may continue to oppose the new system.
  • Technical challenges: The new system may encounter technical challenges during implementation.
  • Cost overruns: The implementation costs may exceed the initial estimates.

Key Assumptions:

  • Employee commitment: Employees will eventually embrace the new system and contribute to its success.
  • Adequate funding: The IRS will have sufficient funding to implement the new system and provide necessary training.
  • Technological advancements: The technology used in the new system will continue to evolve and meet the IRS's needs.

8. Next Steps

The IRS should implement the following steps:

  • Phase 1 (6 months): Develop a comprehensive change management strategy, including communication plans, training programs, and employee support systems. Conduct a pilot program in a specific department.
  • Phase 2 (12 months): Based on the pilot program results, refine the change management strategy and expand the implementation to other departments.
  • Phase 3 (18 months): Roll out the automated system to the entire organization, providing ongoing support and training.
  • Ongoing monitoring and evaluation: Continuously monitor the performance of the new system and make adjustments as needed.

By following these steps, the IRS can successfully implement the automated collection system and achieve its goals of improved efficiency, accuracy, and customer service.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System

Case Description

Describes how the IRS's collection operations changed from a largely manual system (COF) to an automated system (ACS). A central aspect of ACS was the electronic scheduling and maintaining of work. While with ACS the IRS accomplished significant improvements in the task efficiency of its collection operations, the system also led to greater turnover and lower employee morale. This raises questions of how the system could be redesigned. The primary teaching objective of the case is to show how information technology, control systems, and organization design are intertwined and how any change effort must address all three aspects simultaneously.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System

Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Internal Revenue Service: Automated Collection System



Most Read


Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.