Free Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case

"Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case" Harvard business case study is written by Rajita Singh, Romina Mathew, Anjali Bhole Desai, Sudhanshu Bhatt. It deals with the challenges in the field of Human Resource Management. The case study is 9 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 13, 2023

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged approach to address the sexual harassment case involving Professor Michael O'Connell. This approach prioritizes the safety and well-being of the accuser, upholding the university's commitment to a respectful and inclusive environment while ensuring a fair and transparent process for all parties involved.

2. Background

This case study centers on Fern Fort University, a private institution facing a sexual harassment complaint against Professor Michael O'Connell, a highly regarded faculty member. The complaint, filed by a student, alleges inappropriate behavior and a hostile learning environment. The university's administration, led by President Barbara Nelson, faces a complex dilemma. They must balance the need to protect the accuser, uphold the university's values, and ensure a fair process for the accused professor.

The main protagonists are:

  • Barbara Nelson: President of Fern Fort University, responsible for upholding the university's values and ensuring a safe and respectful environment for all.
  • Michael O'Connell: Professor accused of sexual harassment, a valued faculty member with a strong reputation.
  • The Accuser: A student who filed the complaint, seeking justice and a safe learning environment.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study highlights several key issues:

  • Organizational Culture: The university's culture, while generally positive, appears to lack clear guidelines and procedures for handling sexual harassment complaints. This ambiguity creates a potential for mishandling such sensitive situations.
  • Leadership: President Nelson's initial response, while well-intentioned, lacks a clear and decisive strategy. This indecisiveness creates uncertainty and potentially undermines the university's commitment to addressing the issue effectively.
  • Talent Management: The case raises concerns about the university's ability to effectively manage talent, particularly in situations involving serious misconduct allegations. The university's response to the situation will impact its reputation and ability to attract and retain talented faculty and students.
  • Diversity and Inclusion: The case underscores the importance of creating a diverse and inclusive environment where all members feel safe and respected. The university's response to this case will directly impact its commitment to these values.
  • Business Law and Ethics: The university faces legal and ethical obligations to address the complaint fairly and transparently. Failure to do so could result in legal repercussions and damage the university's reputation.

4. Recommendations

1. Immediate Action:

  • Independent Investigation: Engage an external, independent investigator with expertise in sexual harassment cases to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation. This investigation should be conducted with urgency and confidentiality, ensuring the safety and well-being of the accuser.
  • Support for the Accuser: Provide the accuser with immediate support services, including counseling, legal advice, and academic accommodations. This demonstrates the university's commitment to their safety and well-being.
  • Communication Plan: Develop a clear and transparent communication plan for the university community. This plan should address the allegations, the investigation process, and the university's commitment to addressing sexual harassment.

2. Long-Term Strategies:

  • Policy Review and Revision: Conduct a comprehensive review of the university's sexual harassment policy. This review should include input from faculty, staff, and students to ensure the policy is clear, comprehensive, and effectively addresses all forms of harassment.
  • Training and Education: Implement mandatory training programs for all faculty, staff, and students on sexual harassment prevention, reporting procedures, and bystander intervention. This training should be ongoing and tailored to the specific needs of the university community.
  • Culture Change: Develop a strategic plan to foster a culture of respect, inclusivity, and accountability. This plan should include initiatives to promote open communication, bystander intervention, and reporting mechanisms.
  • Leadership Development: Provide leadership training for all university administrators on best practices for handling sexual harassment cases, ensuring a consistent and effective response.
  • Data Collection and Analysis: Implement a system for tracking and analyzing sexual harassment reports. This data will provide valuable insights into the prevalence of harassment, identify trends, and inform the development of effective prevention strategies.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The university's mission emphasizes academic excellence and a commitment to creating a safe and inclusive environment for all. These recommendations align with these core values.
  • External customers and internal clients: These recommendations address the needs of both external stakeholders (students, parents, alumni) and internal stakeholders (faculty, staff).
  • Competitors: The university's reputation as a leader in higher education is at stake. A strong and decisive response to this case will enhance its competitive advantage.
  • Attractiveness: A robust and transparent approach to addressing sexual harassment will enhance the university's attractiveness to prospective students, faculty, and donors.

6. Conclusion

Fern Fort University faces a critical juncture. By adopting these recommendations, the university can demonstrate its commitment to a safe and inclusive environment, uphold its ethical obligations, and protect its reputation. This approach will require decisive leadership, a commitment to transparency, and a willingness to address the underlying cultural issues that contribute to sexual harassment.

7. Discussion

Alternatives:

  • Ignoring the complaint: This option is unacceptable and would violate the university's ethical and legal obligations.
  • Internal investigation: While less costly than an external investigation, an internal investigation may lack the necessary independence and impartiality.
  • Summary dismissal of the professor: This option could be seen as a hasty and unfair response, potentially leading to legal challenges.

Risks:

  • Legal action: The university could face legal action from either the accuser or the accused professor.
  • Reputational damage: A mishandled response could damage the university's reputation and negatively impact its enrollment and fundraising efforts.
  • Loss of faculty and staff: A lack of trust in the university's handling of sexual harassment cases could lead to faculty and staff turnover.

Key Assumptions:

  • The university is committed to creating a safe and inclusive environment for all.
  • The university is willing to invest the resources necessary to implement these recommendations.
  • The university community is willing to engage in open and honest dialogue about sexual harassment.

8. Next Steps

Timeline:

  • Week 1: Engage external investigator, implement support services for the accuser, and develop communication plan.
  • Week 2-4: Conduct investigation, provide updates to the university community.
  • Week 5-8: Review and revise sexual harassment policy, develop training programs.
  • Week 9-12: Implement training programs, launch culture change initiatives, and begin leadership development programs.
  • Ongoing: Continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of these initiatives.

By taking swift and decisive action, Fern Fort University can demonstrate its commitment to a safe and inclusive environment, uphold its ethical obligations, and protect its reputation. This approach requires a comprehensive and sustained effort, but it is essential for the university's long-term success.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case

Case Description

In October 2019, the director of human resources at SMP India Design Centre had a difficult situation to address. She had received a sexual harassment complaint against a senior team member from two female employees, both of whom were relatively new in the organization. Acting promptly based on the organization's procedures manual and policies, the director initiated an enquiry. A detailed investigation found the accused guilty of gross misconduct. However, the surprising punishment handed down by the organization was only a warning letter. It seemed that taking any other action would go against the company's best interests. The director of human resources felt torn between her responsibility to provide a safe and positive workplace for employees versus being a custodian of the corporate brand and public image. But how could she ensure a healthy working environment if the company ignored serious issues such as sexual harassment against its own employees? Should she fight the company's ruling and provide her own advice to employees? Would her loyalty to the organization be questioned if she decided to support the two victims of sexual harassment?

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case

Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Human Resource Management case study - Employee Advocate or Company Custodian: Choosing Sides in a Sexual Harassment Case




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.