Free City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact

"City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact" Harvard business case study is written by Rosabeth Moss Kanter, James Weber. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 31 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 27, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend City Year adopt a multi-pronged strategic approach to achieve long-term impact, focusing on innovation, sustainability, and expansion. This approach involves strengthening core programs, diversifying funding sources, leveraging technology, and building strategic partnerships.

2. Background

City Year is a non-profit organization that mobilizes young adults to serve as mentors and tutors in under-resourced schools. Founded in 1988, City Year has grown significantly, expanding its operations to 29 cities across the US and internationally. The case study focuses on City Year's efforts to transition from a primarily program-focused organization to one that prioritizes long-term, systemic impact.

The main protagonists are:

  • Michael Brown, CEO of City Year, who is tasked with leading the organization through this pivotal transition.
  • The City Year Board of Directors, who are responsible for setting strategic direction and ensuring financial sustainability.
  • The City Year staff, who are responsible for implementing programs and achieving organizational goals.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

Strategic Framework:

To analyze City Year's situation, we will utilize a combination of frameworks:

  • SWOT Analysis: This framework helps identify City Year's Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.
  • Porter's Five Forces: This framework assesses the competitive landscape of the non-profit sector, considering competitive rivalry, threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, and threat of substitutes.
  • Balanced Scorecard: This framework provides a comprehensive view of City Year's performance across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.

Key Findings:

  • Strengths: Strong brand recognition, dedicated staff, proven program effectiveness, strong community partnerships.
  • Weaknesses: Limited funding diversification, reliance on individual donors, lack of standardized data collection, potential for program fatigue.
  • Opportunities: Growing demand for educational support, increasing interest in social impact investing, technological advancements in education, potential for international expansion.
  • Threats: Competition from other non-profits, economic downturns, changing demographics, potential for negative media coverage.

Porter's Five Forces Analysis:

  • Competitive Rivalry: High, with many non-profits offering similar services.
  • Threat of New Entrants: Moderate, as barriers to entry are relatively low.
  • Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Low, as City Year relies on a diverse range of suppliers.
  • Bargaining Power of Buyers: Moderate, as donors and funders have various options.
  • Threat of Substitutes: Moderate, as other educational programs and interventions exist.

Balanced Scorecard:

  • Financial: Increase revenue diversification, reduce reliance on individual donors, improve financial transparency.
  • Customer: Enhance program effectiveness, improve student outcomes, strengthen community engagement.
  • Internal Processes: Standardize data collection, improve program evaluation, streamline operations.
  • Learning and Growth: Foster innovation, attract and retain top talent, promote leadership development.

4. Recommendations

1. Innovation and Program Enhancement:

  • Develop new program models: Explore innovative approaches to address specific educational needs, such as early childhood education, STEM education, or college and career readiness.
  • Leverage technology: Implement data-driven approaches to program evaluation and student support, utilizing AI and machine learning to personalize learning experiences.
  • Develop a social impact measurement framework: Track and measure the long-term impact of City Year programs, demonstrating the organization's value proposition to funders and stakeholders.

2. Diversification and Sustainability:

  • Expand fundraising sources: Explore corporate partnerships, foundation grants, social impact bonds, and crowdfunding platforms.
  • Develop a robust marketing and communications strategy: Enhance brand awareness, engage with potential donors, and showcase City Year's impact.
  • Implement a cost-effective operational model: Optimize resource allocation, streamline processes, and leverage technology to enhance efficiency.

3. Strategic Partnerships and Expansion:

  • Form strategic alliances: Partner with schools, government agencies, and other non-profits to leverage resources and expand reach.
  • Explore international expansion: Identify promising emerging markets with high demand for educational support and align with local partners.
  • Develop a talent management strategy: Attract and retain top talent, invest in leadership development, and foster a culture of innovation and continuous improvement.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on a thorough analysis of City Year's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. They align with the organization's mission to provide educational support and promote youth development. The recommendations are also consistent with current trends in the non-profit sector, such as the growing importance of data-driven decision making, impact measurement, and strategic partnerships.

The recommendations are attractive because they:

  • Increase revenue diversification: This reduces City Year's reliance on individual donors and enhances financial sustainability.
  • Improve program effectiveness: This strengthens City Year's impact and strengthens its value proposition to funders and stakeholders.
  • Expand reach and impact: This allows City Year to reach more students and communities in need.

6. Conclusion

City Year stands at a critical juncture, poised to transition from a program-focused organization to one that prioritizes long-term, systemic impact. By embracing innovation, diversifying funding sources, leveraging technology, and building strategic partnerships, City Year can achieve its ambitious goals and create a lasting legacy of educational excellence.

7. Discussion

Alternative Options:

  • Focusing solely on program expansion: This approach may lead to unsustainable growth and strain resources.
  • Adopting a purely technology-driven approach: This may alienate stakeholders and fail to address the human element of education.
  • Maintaining the status quo: This would limit City Year's potential for growth and impact.

Risks and Key Assumptions:

  • Economic downturn: This could impact funding sources and reduce donor support.
  • Competition from other non-profits: This could limit City Year's market share and impact.
  • Technological advancements: Rapidly evolving technology could require City Year to adapt its approach.

Options Grid:

OptionAdvantagesDisadvantagesRisks
Multi-pronged strategic approachIncreased impact, sustainability, and growthRequires significant investment and change managementEconomic downturn, competition, technological disruption
Focusing solely on program expansionIncreased reach and impactUnsustainable growth, strain on resources
Adopting a purely technology-driven approachEfficiency, scalability, data-driven decision-makingAlienation of stakeholders, lack of human touch
Maintaining the status quoStability, familiarityLimited growth, potential for stagnation

8. Next Steps

  • Develop a detailed strategic plan: This plan should outline specific goals, objectives, timelines, and resources for each recommendation.
  • Establish a task force: This team should be responsible for implementing the strategic plan and monitoring progress.
  • Communicate effectively: City Year should communicate its strategic vision to all stakeholders, including staff, donors, partners, and the public.
  • Continuously evaluate and adapt: City Year should regularly assess the effectiveness of its strategies and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, City Year can position itself for long-term success and continue to make a meaningful difference in the lives of students and communities around the world.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In 2018, City Year was a 30 year old nonprofit that recruited and organized teams of young-adult "volunteers" (corps teams) to provide a year of citizen service. It had 3,100 corps members serving in 327 schools located in 28 U.S. cities. In its early decades, City Year provided a variety of services to a variety of organizations in need. Over its most recent decade, City Year had pivoted to having all corps members serve in low-income public schools to keep students on track to graduation in an effort to reduce the nation's high school dropout rate. City Year also worked with partners to help schools transform themselves to better meet the needs of low-income students, and worked with policy makers and elected officials to promote the value of national citizen service. In 2012, City Year launched a Long Term Impact strategy (LTI) aimed at making a substantial improvement in high school graduation rates. The LTI required City Year to transform itself over time to create an organization capable of delivering its ambitious impact strategy. The case explores City Year's history and its efforts to align its organization with its strategy. In March 2018, City Year CEO Michael Brown must examine the state of his organization and its strategy to determine next steps to achieving its LTI goals.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact

City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - City Year at 30: Toward Long-Term Impact




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.