Free Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management

"Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management" Harvard business case study is written by David G. Fubini, Suraj Srinivasan, Amram Migdal. It deals with the challenges in the field of General Management. The case study is 2 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 20, 2020

At Fern Fort University, we recommend a multi-pronged approach to address the board's concerns regarding the university's strategic direction and senior management's performance. This approach involves a combination of strategic planning, leadership development, performance evaluation, and communication.

2. Background

The case study focuses on Fern Fort University (FFU), a private university facing challenges in its strategic direction and senior management's ability to execute. The board of directors is concerned about the university's declining enrollment, stagnant fundraising efforts, and lack of innovation. The board is particularly concerned about the performance of the university's president, Dr. Jones, and his senior management team.

The main protagonists of the case study are:

  • Dr. Jones: The president of FFU, who is facing criticism from the board for his leadership and strategic direction.
  • The Board of Directors: The governing body of the university, responsible for oversight and strategic direction.
  • The Senior Management Team: The group of executives responsible for implementing the university's strategic plan.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study highlights several critical issues facing FFU:

  • Strategic Drift: The university's strategic plan appears outdated and misaligned with current market trends and student demands.
  • Lack of Innovation: FFU struggles to adapt to the changing landscape of higher education, particularly in areas like online learning and digital transformation.
  • Ineffective Leadership: The board perceives Dr. Jones and his senior management team as lacking the vision, leadership, and execution skills to drive the necessary change.
  • Communication Breakdown: There is a clear lack of communication and transparency between the board and senior management, leading to mistrust and a disconnect in understanding the university's challenges and opportunities.

To analyze the situation further, we can utilize the following frameworks:

  • SWOT Analysis: This framework helps identify FFU's internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats.
  • Porter's Five Forces: This framework analyzes the competitive landscape of higher education, identifying potential threats and opportunities for FFU.
  • Balanced Scorecard: This framework helps assess FFU's performance across various key areas, including financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.

4. Recommendations

To address the challenges faced by FFU, the board should implement the following recommendations:

1. Strategic Realignment:

  • Conduct a comprehensive strategic planning process: This process should involve all stakeholders, including the board, senior management, faculty, and students, to develop a clear vision, mission, and goals for the future of FFU.
  • Develop a new strategic plan: This plan should be aligned with market trends, student needs, and the university's core competencies. It should address key areas like enrollment growth, fundraising, innovation, and digital transformation.
  • Implement a robust performance monitoring system: This system should track progress towards strategic goals and identify areas for improvement.

2. Leadership Development and Performance Evaluation:

  • Conduct a comprehensive leadership assessment: This assessment should evaluate the skills, experience, and leadership styles of Dr. Jones and his senior management team.
  • Develop a leadership development program: This program should focus on enhancing the skills and competencies necessary to lead the university through strategic change.
  • Implement a transparent and rigorous performance evaluation system: This system should evaluate the performance of Dr. Jones and his senior management team against key performance indicators (KPIs) aligned with the strategic plan.

3. Communication and Transparency:

  • Establish a clear and regular communication channel between the board and senior management: This channel should facilitate open dialogue, information sharing, and feedback.
  • Develop a communication strategy to engage stakeholders: This strategy should ensure all stakeholders are informed about the university's strategic direction, progress, and challenges.

4. Innovation and Digital Transformation:

  • Invest in research and development to foster innovation: This investment should focus on areas like online learning, digital marketing, and technological advancements in education.
  • Develop a digital transformation strategy: This strategy should outline how FFU will leverage technology to enhance the student experience, improve efficiency, and drive growth.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core competencies and consistency with mission: The recommendations focus on strengthening FFU's core competencies in education and research while aligning with the university's mission to provide high-quality education.
  • External customers and internal clients: The recommendations address the needs of students, faculty, staff, and donors by focusing on improving the student experience, enhancing faculty development, and strengthening fundraising efforts.
  • Competitors: The recommendations consider the competitive landscape of higher education, particularly the increasing demand for online learning, personalized education, and innovative programs.
  • Attractiveness ' quantitative measures if applicable: The recommendations are expected to improve key performance indicators such as enrollment, fundraising, and student satisfaction, ultimately leading to increased financial stability and long-term growth.

6. Conclusion

FFU faces significant challenges in its strategic direction and senior management's performance. The board's concerns are valid, and immediate action is required to address these issues. By implementing the recommended strategies, FFU can achieve a strategic realignment, strengthen its leadership, improve communication, and foster innovation, ultimately ensuring its long-term success and sustainability.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Replacing Dr. Jones: This option could be considered if the board believes that Dr. Jones is incapable of leading the necessary change. However, this option carries significant risks, including potential disruption and instability within the university.
  • Outsourcing certain functions: This option could be considered to reduce costs and improve efficiency. However, it could also lead to a loss of control and potentially impact the university's core competencies.

Key assumptions:

  • The board and senior management are committed to working together to implement the recommended strategies.
  • The university has the financial resources to invest in the necessary changes.
  • The faculty and staff are willing to embrace innovation and change.

8. Next Steps

To implement the recommendations, the following steps should be taken:

  • Within 3 months: The board should initiate a comprehensive strategic planning process, conduct a leadership assessment, and establish a clear communication channel with senior management.
  • Within 6 months: The board should approve a new strategic plan, develop a leadership development program, and implement a performance evaluation system.
  • Within 12 months: The university should begin implementing the strategic plan, including investments in innovation and digital transformation.

By taking these steps, FFU can overcome its current challenges and position itself for future success in the rapidly evolving landscape of higher education.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

This case explores a new board director who wants more detail from the management team than his fellow directors are willing to press for. New board director Sam Pesca is frustrated that CFO Alex Marotta provides only a minimal two-page financial summary at board meetings, despite Pesca's requests for more comprehensive information. The other directors object to pressing Marotta for more detail, and young CEO R.J. Oscott asks Pesca to refrain from pressing the CFO. This case is part of a series of vignettes that capture different dilemmas faced by directors as they join boards of companies and understand the dynamics of the new boards that they join.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management

Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR General Management case study - Board Director Dilemmas - Pushing Senior Management




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.