Free Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies

"Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies" Harvard business case study is written by Mitsuru Misawa. It deals with the challenges in the field of Finance. The case study is 26 page(s) long and it was first published on : Mar 23, 2006

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that The Oriental Land Company (OLC) continue to invest in its theme parks while adopting a more strategic approach to capital budgeting that incorporates both American and Japanese best practices. This strategy should focus on maximizing shareholder value by balancing profitability, growth, and risk management.

2. Background

This case study analyzes the unique corporate governance and capital budgeting practices of The Oriental Land Company (OLC), the operator of Tokyo Disneyland and DisneySea. It highlights the differences between American and Japanese approaches to capital budgeting and explores the challenges faced by OLC in balancing profitability, growth, and risk management.

The main protagonists of the case study are:

  • The Oriental Land Company (OLC): A Japanese company responsible for building and operating Tokyo Disneyland and DisneySea.
  • The Walt Disney Company: The American company that owns the intellectual property rights to the Disney brand and provides guidance to OLC.
  • Japanese investors: Investors who are accustomed to a more conservative approach to capital budgeting and prioritize long-term stability over short-term profits.
  • American investors: Investors who are more accustomed to higher returns on investment and are willing to accept greater risk.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

This case study can be analyzed through the lens of corporate governance and capital budgeting.

Corporate Governance:

  • Differences in Ownership Structure: OLC is a publicly traded company with a significant ownership stake held by the Mitsui Group, a Japanese conglomerate. This structure influences OLC's decision-making process, promoting a more conservative approach to risk-taking and prioritizing long-term stability.
  • Cultural Differences: Japanese corporate culture emphasizes consensus-building and long-term relationships, which can lead to slower decision-making processes compared to American companies.
  • Role of the Board of Directors: The board of directors plays a crucial role in overseeing OLC's operations and ensuring adherence to corporate governance principles. However, the board's composition and influence may differ from American companies.

Capital Budgeting:

  • Different Approaches: American companies typically focus on maximizing return on investment (ROI) and profitability in their capital budgeting decisions. Japanese companies, on the other hand, prioritize long-term growth and stability, often using conservative payback periods and discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis.
  • Risk Management: OLC faces unique challenges in managing risk due to its dependence on the Disney brand and its exposure to external factors like currency fluctuations and economic downturns.
  • Financial Forecasting: OLC's financial forecasting needs to be accurate and reliable to ensure the success of its capital budgeting decisions. This requires a thorough understanding of the Japanese market, the Disney brand, and the global tourism industry.

4. Recommendations

OLC should adopt a hybrid approach to capital budgeting that incorporates the best practices of both American and Japanese companies. This approach should focus on:

  • Maximizing Shareholder Value: OLC should prioritize decisions that maximize shareholder value by balancing profitability, growth, and risk management.
  • Strategic Investment: OLC should focus on strategic investments that enhance the visitor experience, expand the park's offerings, and attract new demographics.
  • Risk Management: OLC should implement robust risk management strategies to mitigate the impact of external factors like currency fluctuations, economic downturns, and competition.
  • Transparency and Communication: OLC should enhance transparency and communication with its stakeholders, including investors, employees, and the public.
  • Data-Driven Decision Making: OLC should leverage data analytics and financial modeling to inform its capital budgeting decisions and ensure optimal resource allocation.

5. Basis of Recommendations

This recommendation considers the following factors:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: OLC's core competency lies in its ability to create and operate world-class theme parks. The recommended approach aligns with its mission to provide unique and memorable experiences for visitors.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendation considers the needs of both external customers (visitors) and internal clients (employees). It aims to enhance the visitor experience while ensuring a stable and rewarding work environment for employees.
  • Competitors: The recommendation acknowledges the competitive landscape of the theme park industry and encourages OLC to stay ahead of the curve by investing in innovative attractions and technologies.
  • Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: The recommendation encourages OLC to use quantitative measures like NPV, ROI, and payback periods to assess the attractiveness of potential investments.
  • Assumptions: The recommendation assumes that OLC will continue to maintain a strong relationship with The Walt Disney Company and that the Japanese tourism market will continue to grow.

6. Conclusion

By adopting a hybrid approach to capital budgeting that incorporates both American and Japanese best practices, OLC can maximize shareholder value while ensuring long-term growth and stability. This approach will require a commitment to transparency, communication, and data-driven decision making.

7. Discussion

Other alternatives not selected include:

  • Purely American Approach: This approach would prioritize short-term profitability and potentially lead to higher risk-taking.
  • Purely Japanese Approach: This approach would prioritize long-term stability and potentially limit growth opportunities.

The key risks associated with the recommended approach include:

  • Misalignment of Interests: The interests of OLC's stakeholders, including the Mitsui Group and American investors, may not always align.
  • Economic Downturn: A significant economic downturn could negatively impact visitor numbers and profitability.
  • Competition: Competition from other theme parks and entertainment options could erode OLC's market share.

8. Next Steps

The following steps should be taken to implement the recommended approach:

  • Form a Task Force: Establish a task force composed of representatives from OLC's management team, board of directors, and key stakeholders.
  • Develop a Strategic Plan: Create a comprehensive strategic plan that outlines OLC's capital budgeting priorities and risk management strategies.
  • Implement Data Analytics: Invest in data analytics capabilities to improve financial forecasting and decision-making.
  • Enhance Communication: Improve communication with stakeholders through regular reports, investor presentations, and public outreach.
  • Monitor Progress: Regularly monitor the progress of the plan and make adjustments as needed.

By taking these steps, OLC can ensure that its capital budgeting decisions are aligned with its long-term goals and that it continues to be a successful and profitable company.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

In 1997, building on its earlier success with Tokyo Disneyland, Oriental Land Corp. Japan and the Walt Disney Co. discussed the possibility of a new joint project known as the Tokyo DisneySea Park. Different approaches toward capital budgeting and distinct corporate governance regimes led the two firms to evaluate the project in different ways. Although globalization of the Japanese economy has advanced with astounding speed, management philosophy and capital budgeting techniques still differ significantly among Japanese and American firms. In a joint venture, such differences have a momentous impact on decision-making processes. Illustrates key divergent practices between Japanese and American firms in the realm of corporate governance and finance.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies

Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Finance case study - Tokyo Disneyland and the DisneySea Park: Corporate Governance and Differences in Capital Budgeting Concepts and Methods Between American and Japanese Companies




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.