Free A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford Case Study Solution | Assignment Help

Harvard Case - A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford

"A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford" Harvard business case study is written by Mark E. Haskins, Luann J. Lynch. It deals with the challenges in the field of Accounting. The case study is 33 page(s) long and it was first published on : Sep 5, 2018

At Fern Fort University, we recommend that General Dynamics and Ford adopt a comprehensive approach to revenue recognition, aligning their practices with the new ASC 606 standard. This approach should encompass a thorough review of existing accounting procedures and policies, implementation of activity-based costing for more accurate cost allocation, and a robust system for tracking and managing revenue streams. This recommendation is based on a thorough analysis of the case study, considering both the unique challenges and opportunities presented by the new standard.

2. Background

This case study explores the impact of the new ASC 606 standard on revenue recognition for two prominent companies: General Dynamics, a defense contractor, and Ford, an automotive manufacturer. The new standard, which replaced the previous revenue recognition guidelines, introduces a more principles-based approach, requiring companies to recognize revenue when control of goods or services is transferred to the customer. This shift presents significant challenges for both companies, requiring them to re-evaluate their accounting procedures and policies, particularly in areas like cost allocation, contract management, and revenue recognition timing.

The main protagonists of the case study are the accounting teams within General Dynamics and Ford, who are tasked with navigating the complex changes brought about by ASC 606. The case study highlights the challenges they face, including understanding the new standard's requirements, adapting existing systems and processes, and ensuring compliance with the new regulations.

3. Analysis of the Case Study

The case study can be analyzed through the lens of several frameworks, including:

  • Financial Accounting Framework: The transition to ASC 606 necessitates a thorough review of the companies' financial accounting systems and processes. This includes evaluating existing accounting procedures and policies, identifying potential areas of non-compliance, and developing strategies for adapting to the new standard's requirements.
  • Management Accounting Framework: The new standard necessitates a shift in the way companies manage their costs. Activity-based costing (ABC) can be a valuable tool for accurately allocating costs to specific revenue streams, providing a more comprehensive understanding of profitability and driving more informed decision-making.
  • Corporate Governance Framework: The new standard requires companies to establish robust internal controls for revenue recognition, ensuring compliance with the new regulations and minimizing the risk of financial reporting errors. This involves strengthening governance structures, implementing clear policies and procedures, and enhancing internal audit processes.

4. Recommendations

To effectively implement the new ASC 606 standard, General Dynamics and Ford should consider the following recommendations:

1. Comprehensive Review and Adaptation:

  • Accounting Procedures and Policies: Conduct a thorough review of existing accounting procedures and policies to identify areas requiring modification to comply with ASC 606. This review should include a detailed assessment of contract terms, revenue recognition criteria, and cost allocation methods.
  • Accounting Systems and Processes: Evaluate the existing accounting systems and processes to identify areas requiring improvement or replacement to support the new revenue recognition requirements. This may involve upgrading IT systems, implementing new software solutions, or streamlining existing processes.
  • Training and Education: Provide comprehensive training to employees involved in revenue recognition processes, ensuring they understand the new standard's requirements, implementation procedures, and potential impact on their roles.

2. Implementation of Activity-Based Costing (ABC):

  • Cost Allocation: Implement ABC to accurately allocate costs to specific revenue streams, providing a more granular understanding of profitability and driving informed decision-making. This will enable companies to identify profitable and unprofitable contracts, optimize pricing strategies, and improve resource allocation.
  • Cost Analysis: Utilize ABC to analyze cost drivers and identify opportunities for cost reduction and efficiency improvements. This analysis can help companies optimize manufacturing processes, streamline operations, and improve overall profitability.

3. Robust Revenue Management System:

  • Revenue Recognition: Develop a robust system for tracking and managing revenue streams, ensuring compliance with ASC 606 requirements. This system should include clear processes for identifying revenue recognition criteria, documenting contract terms, and tracking revenue realization.
  • Contract Management: Implement a comprehensive contract management system to ensure proper documentation, tracking, and monitoring of all contracts. This system should include features for identifying critical contract terms, monitoring contract performance, and managing contract amendments.
  • Internal Controls: Strengthen internal controls for revenue recognition, including clear policies and procedures, segregation of duties, and regular internal audits. This will help minimize the risk of financial reporting errors and ensure compliance with the new standard.

5. Basis of Recommendations

These recommendations are based on the following considerations:

  • Core Competencies and Consistency with Mission: The recommendations are aligned with the core competencies of both companies, focusing on enhancing financial reporting accuracy, improving cost management, and strengthening internal controls. These initiatives are consistent with their mission to deliver high-quality products and services while maintaining financial stability.
  • External Customers and Internal Clients: The recommendations prioritize the needs of both external customers and internal clients. By ensuring accurate and timely revenue recognition, companies can provide reliable financial information to investors and stakeholders. By implementing ABC and improving cost management, companies can optimize resource allocation and improve overall efficiency, benefiting both internal and external stakeholders.
  • Competitors: The recommendations consider the competitive landscape and the need to maintain a competitive advantage. By adopting a proactive approach to ASC 606 implementation, companies can ensure they are well-positioned to compete effectively in the market.
  • Attractiveness ' Quantitative Measures: The recommendations are expected to have a positive impact on the companies' financial performance. Implementing ABC can lead to cost reductions and efficiency improvements, while a robust revenue management system can enhance revenue recognition accuracy and minimize the risk of financial reporting errors. These improvements can contribute to higher profitability, improved financial performance, and enhanced investor confidence.
  • Assumptions: The recommendations are based on the assumption that both companies have the resources and commitment to implement the necessary changes. It is also assumed that the new standard will remain in effect for the foreseeable future.

6. Conclusion

The transition to ASC 606 represents a significant opportunity for General Dynamics and Ford to enhance their financial reporting, improve cost management, and strengthen internal controls. By adopting a comprehensive approach that includes a thorough review of existing procedures, implementation of ABC, and a robust revenue management system, these companies can ensure compliance with the new standard, enhance their financial performance, and maintain their competitive edge.

7. Discussion

While the recommended approach is considered the most effective, other alternatives exist:

  • Minimalist Approach: This approach involves making only the minimum changes necessary to comply with ASC 606, potentially leading to suboptimal results and increased risk of non-compliance.
  • Outsourcing Approach: This approach involves outsourcing revenue recognition processes to specialized firms, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced control over internal processes.

The recommended approach minimizes the risks associated with these alternatives by ensuring a comprehensive and proactive approach to ASC 606 implementation. However, it is important to acknowledge the following key assumptions:

  • Resource Availability: Successful implementation requires sufficient resources, including financial, human, and technological resources.
  • Management Commitment: Strong commitment from management is crucial for driving change and ensuring successful implementation.
  • Employee Acceptance: Employees must be engaged and supportive of the changes to ensure smooth implementation.

8. Next Steps

To implement the recommended approach, the following steps should be taken:

  • Phase 1 (Months 1-3): Conduct a thorough review of existing accounting procedures and policies, identify areas for improvement, and develop a detailed implementation plan.
  • Phase 2 (Months 4-6): Implement ABC, develop a robust revenue management system, and train employees on the new procedures and processes.
  • Phase 3 (Months 7-9): Monitor the implementation process, make necessary adjustments, and ensure compliance with ASC 606.
  • Phase 4 (Months 10-12): Conduct a comprehensive review of the implemented changes, assess the impact on financial performance, and identify areas for further optimization.

By following these steps, General Dynamics and Ford can successfully navigate the new era of revenue recognition, ensuring compliance with ASC 606, enhancing their financial performance, and maintaining their competitive edge.

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford

more similar case solutions ...

Case Description

Among only a handful of early adopters of a new revenue recognition mandate for calendar year 2017 annual reports, beginning of the year retained earnings for Ford Motor Company (Ford) was adjusted $36 million higher while General Dynamic's was adjusted down by $301 million, both a result of their early adoption of the new revenue recognition guidelines. A new revenue recognition mandate, she noted three important points.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Write my custom case study solution for Harvard HBR case - A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford

A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford FAQ

What are the qualifications of the writers handling the "A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford" case study?

Our writers hold advanced degrees in their respective fields, including MBAs and PhDs from top universities. They have extensive experience in writing and analyzing complex case studies such as " A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford ", ensuring high-quality, academically rigorous solutions.

How do you ensure confidentiality and security in handling client information?

We prioritize confidentiality by using secure data encryption, access controls, and strict privacy policies. Apart from an email, we don't collect any information from the client. So there is almost zero risk of breach at our end. Our financial transactions are done by Paypal on their website so all your information is very secure.

What is Fern Fort Univeristy's process for quality control and proofreading in case study solutions?

The A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford case study solution undergoes a rigorous quality control process, including multiple rounds of proofreading and editing by experts. We ensure that the content is accurate, well-structured, and free from errors before delivery.

Where can I find free case studies solution for Harvard HBR Strategy Case Studies?

At Fern Fort University provides free case studies solutions for a variety of Harvard HBR case studies. The free solutions are written to build "Wikipedia of case studies on internet". Custom solution services are written based on specific requirements. If free solution helps you with your task then feel free to donate a cup of coffee.

I’m looking for Harvard Business Case Studies Solution for A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford. Where can I get it?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford" at Fern Fort University.

Can I Buy Case Study Solution for A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford & Seek Case Study Help at Fern Fort University?

Yes, you can order your custom case study solution for the Harvard business case - "A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford" at Fern Fort University. You can get a comprehensive solution tailored to your requirements.

Can I hire someone only to analyze my A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford solution? I have written it, and I want an expert to go through it.

🎓 Struggling with term papers, essays, or Harvard case studies? Look no further! Fern Fort University offers top-quality, custom-written solutions tailored to your needs. Boost your grades and save time with expertly crafted content. Order now and experience academic excellence! 🌟📚 #MBA #HarvardCaseStudies #CustomEssays #AcademicSuccess #StudySmart Pay an expert to write my HBR study solution for the case study - A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford

Where can I find a case analysis for Harvard Business School or HBR Cases?

You can find the case study solution of the HBR case study "A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford" at Fern Fort University.

Which are some of the all-time best Harvard Review Case Studies?

Some of our all time favorite case studies are -

Can I Pay Someone To Solve My Case Study - "A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford"?

Yes, you can pay experts at Fern Fort University to write a custom case study solution that meets all your professional and academic needs.

Do I have to upload case material for the case study A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford to buy a custom case study solution?

We recommend to upload your case study because Harvard HBR case studies are updated regularly. So for custom solutions it helps to refer to the same document. The uploading of specific case materials for A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford ensures that the custom solution is aligned precisely with your needs. This helps our experts to deliver the most accurate, latest, and relevant solution.

What is a Case Research Method? How can it be applied to the A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford case study?

The Case Research Method involves in-depth analysis of a situation, identifying key issues, and proposing strategic solutions. For "A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford" case study, this method would be applied by examining the case’s context, challenges, and opportunities to provide a robust solution that aligns with academic rigor.

"I’m Seeking Help with Case Studies,” How can Fern Fort University help me with my case study assignments?

Fern Fort University offers comprehensive case study solutions, including writing, analysis, and consulting services. Whether you need help with strategy formulation, problem-solving, or academic compliance, their experts are equipped to assist with your assignments.

Achieve academic excellence with Fern Fort University! 🌟 We offer custom essays, term papers, and Harvard HBR business case studies solutions crafted by top-tier experts. Experience tailored solutions, uncompromised quality, and timely delivery. Elevate your academic performance with our trusted and confidential services. Visit Fern Fort University today! #AcademicSuccess #CustomEssays #MBA #CaseStudies

How do you handle tight deadlines for case study solutions?

We are adept at managing tight deadlines by allocating sufficient resources and prioritizing urgent projects. Our team works efficiently without compromising quality, ensuring that even last-minute requests are delivered on time

What if I need revisions or edits after receiving the case study solution?

We offer free revisions to ensure complete client satisfaction. If any adjustments are needed, our team will work closely with you to refine the solution until it meets your expectations.

How do you ensure that the case study solution is plagiarism-free?

All our case study solutions are crafted from scratch and thoroughly checked using advanced plagiarism detection software. We guarantee 100% originality in every solution delivered

How do you handle references and citations in the case study solutions?

We follow strict academic standards for references and citations, ensuring that all sources are properly credited according to the required citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.).

Hire an expert to write custom solution for HBR Accounting case study - A New Era in Revenue Recognition: General Dynamics and Ford




Referrences & Bibliography for SWOT Analysis | SWOT Matrix | Strategic Management

1. Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 139-148.

2. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 113-124.

3. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1995). The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 57-71.

4. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 66-74.

5. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator's solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business Review Press.

6. D'Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Harvard Business Review Press.

7. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 78-91.

8. Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and business strategy in historical perspective. Business History Review, 76(1), 37-74.

9. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

10. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

11. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.

12. Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59-67.

13. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Harvard Business Press.

14. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137-145.

15. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Simon and Schuster.

16. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

17. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

18. Rumelt, R. P. (1979). Evaluation of strategy: Theory and models. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 107-126.

19. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 556-570.

20. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.