Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Case Study Memo

Case Study Recommendation Memo Assignment

At Fern Fort University, we write Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case study recommendation memo as per the Harvard Business Review Finance & Accounting case memo framework. If you are looking for MBA, Executive MBA or Corporate / Professional level recommendation memo then feel free to connect with us.

Other topics that can be covered in the above case memo are Financial management, International business, Risk management . The recommendations in the case memo are - aligned with strategy of the company, based on robust data, and provide a clear roadmap for execution.

Order Now - Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Case Memo

Order Now - Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Porter 5 Forces Analysis & Industry Analysis

Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Description

Finance & Accounting Case Study | Authors :: Anette Mikes

This case introduces risk management in the context of corporate lending, one of the bread-and-butter functions of commercial banks. It evokes the cultural tension between the risk function and the business line, which in this organization reverberated long after the decisive votes were cast at the group credit committee. The case further motivates debate on calculative cultures, and the role of model-based risk assessments in decision-making, and underlines the role of judgment in risk decisions. Modeling and judgment carry different weight in different types of risk decisions. While risk models can be relied upon as the key decision-makers in a retail banking environment (e.g. credit card applications), in the case of large credit decisions, their reliability is, generally, low. This is because the key features of the proposals at hand cannot all be condensed into risk metrics; as in these proposals, several "qualitative" issues arise that the decision-maker needs to judge in tandem with the quantitative metrics. The exercise also highlights that model-based risk metrics are themselves judgmental (they reflect the assumptions of the modeler) and that their use must be as much an art as a science. The story has got a temporal dimension: one proposal was current in mid-2006, the other in late 2008, two very different credit environments.

Financial management, International business, Risk management

Purpose of Finance & Accounting Case Study Recommendation Memo

A Case Study Memo or Case Study Recommendation Memo is a routinely used document in leading organizations, and you may be writing number of such memos to executive leadership to “sell” or elevate an initiative that either you are undertaking or you wanted to kick start. Therefore, it is essential that you have a professional case study recommendation memo.

The purpose of a recommendation memo is to concisely recommend a course of action and provide rationale supporting the recommendation. The case study recommendation memo is a one-two page document (not including exhibits) that recommends your course of action and rationale. This format promotes a concise and clear strategic thought process.

Elements of a Case Study Recommendation Memo for – MBA & Executive MBA

1. First Paragraph of Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" recommendation memo

  • This paragraph expresses your intent or action that you required after reading the Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case study (This recommends……).
  • Topic overview of the case study (the “what”, not “when” or “how”): costs, funding, etc.
  • Ends with the hook: selling idea, the “why” or payoff: this part reveals the author’s point of view. What you intend to do after reading the case and it clearly mention your decision.

Order Now - Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Case Memo

Order Now - Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" SWOT & PESTEL Analysis

2. Background of Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case study

This paragraph explains why we are talking about this today. It lays out the story. It provides us details from the case story such as -

  • Historical perspective on the problem is provided. Details are elaborated that underline the given problem.
  • Highlights - what brought us to this moment, why we are in this position, what brought about the need to make this decision.
  • Dimensionalize the importance of the problem to the organization and how it is impacting the organization.
  • Constraints – Provide a situational analysis based on case study analysis.
  • Keep the background section both factual and concise. It is part of the memo where we provide a brief insight into the problem and define the problem.


Is the background clear, concise, and easy to follow?
Does it explain why action is needed now?
Does the appropriate sense of urgency come across in the case study?

3. Recommendations for Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Case Memo

Recommendations section will provide details regarding what is needed to be done, how it can be done, when to do it and who will do it. It can be elaborated with scenario planning as businesses

  • The details of what, when and how. NO 'why'.
  • This section should be very specific (100% clear). It must be actionable (How much will it cost, when, how, who). The reader should be able to read this and know how to carry out this recommendation.
  • Some cases will require more than one recommendation. It often happens that the firm will require more than one recommendations as there are numerous unknown in the market place.


Is the recommendation clear and actionable? Does the firm has capability to implement the recommendations or does it needs to hire fresh talent?

4. Basis for the Recommendations

  • Here the reader of the case memo will learn WHY each recommendation is the UNIQUE right thing to do.
  • 2-3 solid reasons are typical. The reasons should be backed by clear logic, organization’s vision and mission statements, and robust data analysis.
  • Orignal recommendation can be backed by few supporting roadmap to actions. In operations cases the Critical Path Method of PERT can be used to illustrate the point.
  • Support includes impact on profit, share, and anything else that can affect long-term business goals of the firm.
  • Analysis should address applicable quantitative issues such as NPV, break even analysis, pro forma statement of project budget, sensitivity analysis; as well as qualitative issues, such as, technology consistency, architectural conformance, innovation potential, etc.
  • Appeals to precedent and anecdotal evidence in absence of data, but only in limited, carefully constrained manner.
  • Shows how the recommendation will put the firm at a competitive advantage or is simply acompetitive necessity.
  • The goal is to read the basis and conclude the recommendation.


  • Is the recommendation an inescapable conclusion of the basis?
  • Does the basis for recommendation appropriately consider:
    1. Core competencies and consistency with mission?
    2. External customers and internal clients?
    3. Competitors?
    4. Attractiveness – quantitative measures if applicable (e.g., NPV, ROI, break-even, payback)?
  • Are all assumptions explicitly stated (e.g., needs, technology trends)?

5. Discussions

  • Outline other alternatives not selected and provide brief reasoning for doing so.
  • Discuss risks and key assumptions for Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case memo (use full disclosure, reference options grid) of your recommendation.
  • When you give a precise number or range, you must support the basis as well.


  • Is the analysis thorough with key alternatives fairly considered using options grid?
  • Risks associated with recommendation for Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" are properly addressed given the present capabilities and future expectations?

6. Next Steps for Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case study memo

  • Clearly specify the roadmap of the execution. Provide specific date and action that are required to carry on the next steps.
  • Task assignment, objectives, roles and metrics should be mentioned in advance to reduce ambiguity and replication. (what will be done, by whom, and by when)


  • Clear follow-up/next steps?
  • If appropriate, lay out timeline with key milestones to implement recommendation.

7. Exhibits for Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case memo

  • An Exhibit can be a data chart, map, graph, grid, or simple data table.
  • While doing the calculations please mention all the assumptions. The reader won’t able to decipher each of the assumption so make them explicit.
  • Exhibits should have Title, sources, footnotes to calculation. The point of the Exhibit should be instantly clear to the reader.
  • Exhibits should be cited in the proper order (i.e., do not cite Exhibit 4 first in your Memo and then Exhibit 2).

Checklist for Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" case study memo exhibit

  • Is the analysis presented in the case memo - precise, accurate, and data-based?
  • Are the exhibits clearly laid out, titled, and referenced in the case study memo?
  • Is every assumption mentioned in the case memo is explicitly listed?

NOTE: Every memo may not include every element described above. The specific case will dictate what must be included. For custom case memo please email us or process the order.

You can order Risk Management at Wellfleet Bank: Deciding about "Megadeals" Case Study Recommendation Memo with us at Fern Fort University .