Order custom Harvard Business Case Study Analysis & Solution. Starting just $19
Fern Fort University
Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Case Study Memo
Case Study Recommendation Memo Assignment
At Fern Fort University, we write Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case study recommendation memo as per the Harvard Business Review Global Business case memo framework. If you are looking for MBA, Executive MBA or Corporate / Professional level recommendation memo then feel free to connect with us.
Other topics that can be covered in the above case memo are Intellectual property, Manufacturing, Technology . The recommendations in the case memo are - aligned with strategy of the company, based on robust data, and provide a clear roadmap for execution.
Order Now - Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Case Memo
Order Now - Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Porter 5 Forces Analysis & Industry Analysis
Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Description
Global Business Case Study | Authors :: Yahong Li, Jiangyong Lu, Zhigang Tao, Shangjin Wei
In May 2006, Foxconn International Holdings first discovered a trade secret leakage to BYD Company Limited through current and former employees. Despite successful conviction of four individuals involved, prosecutors dropped all criminal charges against BYD in December 2008. Around 400 senior managers and engineers have left Foxconn for BYD since 2003, posing continuous threats of further infringement of intellectual property ("IP") rights. In response to a deep global recession since late 2008, one of Foxconn's strategies has been to increase investments in research on and production of smartphones, which maintain strong demand relative to traditional mobile phones. Because Foxconn's factories are located mainly in emerging markets with high IP risks, the success of this strategy is being threatened by ineffective IP protection. It is imperative for the company to revisit its IP management strategies, not only to protect its research and development investment but also to generate extra revenue for survival. It also has to devise an appropriate litigation strategy against BYD.
Intellectual property, Manufacturing, Technology
Purpose of Global Business Case Study Recommendation Memo
A Case Study Memo or Case Study Recommendation Memo is a routinely used document in leading organizations, and you may be writing number of such memos to executive leadership to “sell” or elevate an initiative that either you are undertaking or you wanted to kick start. Therefore, it is essential that you have a professional case study recommendation memo.
The purpose of a recommendation memo is to concisely recommend a course of action and provide rationale supporting the recommendation. The case study recommendation memo is a one-two page document (not including exhibits) that recommends your course of action and rationale. This format promotes a concise and clear strategic thought process.
Elements of a Case Study Recommendation Memo for – MBA & Executive MBA
1. First Paragraph of Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets recommendation memo
- This paragraph expresses your intent or action that you required after reading the Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case study (This recommends……).
- Topic overview of the case study (the “what”, not “when” or “how”): costs, funding, etc.
- Ends with the hook: selling idea, the “why” or payoff: this part reveals the author’s point of view. What you intend to do after reading the case and it clearly mention your decision.
Order Now - Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Case Memo
Order Now - Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets SWOT & PESTEL Analysis
2. Background of Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case study
This paragraph explains why we are talking about this today. It lays out the story. It provides us details from the case story such as -
- Historical perspective on the problem is provided. Details are elaborated that underline the given problem.
- Highlights - what brought us to this moment, why we are in this position, what brought about the need to make this decision.
- Dimensionalize the importance of the problem to the organization and how it is impacting the organization.
- Constraints – Provide a situational analysis based on case study analysis.
- Keep the background section both factual and concise. It is part of the memo where we provide a brief insight into the problem and define the problem.
Checklist
Is the background clear, concise, and easy to follow?
Does it explain why action is needed now?
Does the appropriate sense of urgency come across in the case study?
3. Recommendations for Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Case Memo
Recommendations section will provide details regarding what is needed to be done, how it can be done, when to do it and who will do it. It can be elaborated with scenario planning as businesses
- The details of what, when and how. NO 'why'.
- This section should be very specific (100% clear). It must be actionable (How much will it cost, when, how, who). The reader should be able to read this and know how to carry out this recommendation.
- Some cases will require more than one recommendation. It often happens that the firm will require more than one recommendations as there are numerous unknown in the market place.
Checklist
Is the recommendation clear and actionable? Does the firm has capability to implement the recommendations or does it needs to hire fresh talent?
4. Basis for the Recommendations
- Here the reader of the case memo will learn WHY each recommendation is the UNIQUE right thing to do.
- 2-3 solid reasons are typical. The reasons should be backed by clear logic, organization’s vision and mission statements, and robust data analysis.
- Orignal recommendation can be backed by few supporting roadmap to actions. In operations cases the Critical Path Method of PERT can be used to illustrate the point.
- Support includes impact on profit, share, and anything else that can affect long-term business goals of the firm.
- Analysis should address applicable quantitative issues such as NPV, break even analysis, pro forma statement of project budget, sensitivity analysis; as well as qualitative issues, such as, technology consistency, architectural conformance, innovation potential, etc.
- Appeals to precedent and anecdotal evidence in absence of data, but only in limited, carefully constrained manner.
- Shows how the recommendation will put the firm at a competitive advantage or is simply acompetitive necessity.
- The goal is to read the basis and conclude the recommendation.
Checklist
- Is the recommendation an inescapable conclusion of the basis?
- Does the basis for recommendation appropriately consider:
1. Core competencies and consistency with mission?
2. External customers and internal clients?
3. Competitors?
4. Attractiveness – quantitative measures if applicable (e.g., NPV, ROI, break-even, payback)? - Are all assumptions explicitly stated (e.g., needs, technology trends)?
5. Discussions
- Outline other alternatives not selected and provide brief reasoning for doing so.
- Discuss risks and key assumptions for Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case memo (use full disclosure, reference options grid) of your recommendation.
- When you give a precise number or range, you must support the basis as well.
Checklist
- Is the analysis thorough with key alternatives fairly considered using options grid?
- Risks associated with recommendation for Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets are properly addressed given the present capabilities and future expectations?
6. Next Steps for Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case study memo
- Clearly specify the roadmap of the execution. Provide specific date and action that are required to carry on the next steps.
- Task assignment, objectives, roles and metrics should be mentioned in advance to reduce ambiguity and replication. (what will be done, by whom, and by when)
Checklist
- Clear follow-up/next steps?
- If appropriate, lay out timeline with key milestones to implement recommendation.
7. Exhibits for Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case memo
- An Exhibit can be a data chart, map, graph, grid, or simple data table.
- While doing the calculations please mention all the assumptions. The reader won’t able to decipher each of the assumption so make them explicit.
- Exhibits should have Title, sources, footnotes to calculation. The point of the Exhibit should be instantly clear to the reader.
- Exhibits should be cited in the proper order (i.e., do not cite Exhibit 4 first in your Memo and then Exhibit 2).
Checklist for Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets case study memo exhibit
- Is the analysis presented in the case memo - precise, accurate, and data-based?
- Are the exhibits clearly laid out, titled, and referenced in the case study memo?
- Is every assumption mentioned in the case memo is explicitly listed?
NOTE: Every memo may not include every element described above. The specific case will dictate what must be included. For custom case memo please email us or process the order.
You can order Foxconn V BYD (B): Strategic Approach to Intellectual Property Management in Emerging Markets Case Study Recommendation Memo with us at Fern Fort University .
Order Now
Next 5 Case Study Recommendation Memo
- Wal-Mart China: Sustainable Operations Strategy Case Study Recommendation Memo
- ONGC India: In Search of a New Growth Strategy Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Gazprom (B): Energy and Strategy in a New Era Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Wanxiang Group: A Chinese Company's Global Strategy Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited: A Global Company's China Strategy Porter Five Forces Analysis
Previous 5 Case Study Recommendation Memo
- L'Oreal S.A.: Rolling out the Global Diversity Strategy Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Should You Have a Global Strategy? Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Gas Natural BAN's Strategy for Low-Income Sectors -An Update Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Strategies for Building Effective Virtual Teams: Trust is Key Porter Five Forces Analysis
- Differentiation Beyond Price: CD&R's Strategy in Acquiring Hussmann Porter Five Forces Analysis
HBR Case Studies Solutions
- Wal-Mart China: Sustainable Operations Strategy case study solution
- ONGC India: In Search of a New Growth Strategy case study solution
- Gazprom (B): Energy and Strategy in a New Era case study solution
- Wanxiang Group: A Chinese Company's Global Strategy case study solution
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited: A Global Company's China Strategy case study solution